MHB Eggy's question at Yahoo Answers regarding optimization with constraint

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus Max Min problem help?

A cone-shaped paper drinking cup is to hold 10ml of water. What is height and radius of the cup that will require the least amount of paper?

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus Max Min problem help? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Eggy,

Using Lagrange multipliers, we have the objective function (using the formula for the lateral surface area of a cone):

$$f(h,r)=\pi r\sqrt{r^2+h^2}$$

subject to the constraint on the volume in ml:

$$g(h,r)=\frac{\pi}{3}hr^2-V=0$$

We have used the constant $V$ rather than the given value as we can just plug this in at the end of the problem.

Hence, we obtain the system:

$$\pi r\frac{h}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}=\lambda\left(\frac{\pi r^2}{3} \right)$$

$$\pi\left(r\frac{r}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}+\sqrt{r^2+h^2} \right)=\lambda\left(\frac{2\pi hr}{3} \right)$$

This system may be simplified to:

$$\frac{h}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}=\lambda\left(\frac{r}{3} \right)$$

$$\frac{2r^2+h^2}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}=\lambda\left(\frac{2hr}{3} \right)$$

Solving both equation for $\lambda$ and equating, we obtain:

$$\lambda=\frac{3h}{r\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}=\frac{3(2r^2+h^2)}{2hr\sqrt{r^2+r^2}}$$

This implies:

$$h^2=2r^2$$

Substituting into the constraint for $r^2$, we find:

$$\frac{\pi}{3}h\left(\frac{h^2}{2} \right)-V=0$$

Solving for $h$ we obtain:

$$h=\sqrt[3]{\frac{6V}{\pi}}$$

and so:

$$r=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{\sqrt[3]{\frac{6V}{\pi}}}{\sqrt{2}}$$

Now, since $$V=10\text{ mL}$$, and $$1\text{ mL}=1\text{ cm}^3$$, we find that $r$ and $h$ in cm are:

$$h=\sqrt[3]{\frac{60}{\pi}}$$

$$r=\frac{\sqrt[3]{\frac{60}{\pi}}}{\sqrt{2}}$$

To Eggy and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization problems in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Well, since I don't know about Lagrange Multipliers, this is how I would have done it:

A=\pi r\sqrt{r^2+h^2}

V=\dfrac{\pi}{3}hr^2

Keeping in mind that V is a constant (in this case 10).

Since we're minimizing the area, we need to differentiate A, but having r and h as variables, we need to use the expression for V to get h in terms or r, or r in terms of h. I'm going with h in terms of r.

V=\dfrac{\pi}{3}hr^2

h = \dfrac{3V}{\pi r^2}

Substituting in the area expression:

A=\pi r\sqrt{r^2+\dfrac{9V^2}{\pi^2 r^4}}

Or we could write it like this:

A=\sqrt{\pi^2r^2\left(r^2+\dfrac{9V^2}{\pi^2 r^4}\right)}

A=\sqrt{\pi^2r^4 + \dfrac{9V^2}{r^2}}

Differentiate and set to zero for optimum:

A'=\dfrac12 \left(\pi^2r^4 + \dfrac{9V^2}{r^2}\right)^{-0.5} \cdot \left(4\pi^2r^3 - \dfrac{18V^2}{r^3}\right) = 0

\dfrac{\left(2\pi^2r^3 - \dfrac{9V^2}{r^3}\right)}{\sqrt{\pi^2r^4 + \dfrac{9V^2}{r^2}}}=0

2\pi^2r^3 - \dfrac{9V^2}{r^3} = 0

r = \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3V}{\sqrt{2}\pi}}

The height is then:

h = \dfrac{3V}{\pi \left(\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3V}{\sqrt{2}\pi}}\right)^2}

Simplified to:

h = \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{6V}{\pi}}

Which are both the same as what Mark obtained. (Happy)

My method just maybe is a little longer/tedious because of many simplifications involved, but that's using the tools I know.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top