Eigenenergy of triangular molecule

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the eigenenergy of a triangular molecule with two electrons occupying three 1s orbitals. The participants analyze the Hilbert space structure, noting that the symmetric spatial state requires the spins to be in a singlet state, complicating the derivation of triplet state energy. They establish a Hamiltonian matrix and calculate eigenenergies and eigenvectors, identifying the lowest eigenvalue as -2 for the singlet state and 1 for the triplet state. The conversation also touches on the implications of adding a U term to account for Coulomb repulsion, leading to significant energy splitting. The discussion concludes with references to the Hubbard Model and its relation to the Hückel Hamiltonian.
physicsxanime
Messages
13
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
See the screenshot next
Relevant Equations
Eigenenergy E is ##\hat{H}\psi = E\psi##
electron is fermion, so it should be antisymmetrized
1716588887142.png

I am preparing for graduate prelim exam:
My attempt is that, I have three sites for each of the electron to be at, each of them are 1s orbital. Also, electron has a spin 1/2. So, I think the Hilbert space would be quite large, I have state of both electron on each site 1, 2, 3 with singlet spins. Then there are 3 more state of electron occupying a different site. My confusion here is then, since both electrons are in s state, they are in symmetric state, which forces the spin to be in singlet which is anti-symmetric. Then how do I get the triplet state energy? Also the Hilbert space is now size of 6, How am I diagonalizing 6x6 matric?

B is to add a U term in the diagonals of singlet state, which is the electron on same site?This would split the eigenenergy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since A says to neglect Coulomb repulsion, start with finding the eigenstates of a single electron, then you can put the two electrons in these eigenstates while taking care of building anti-symmetric states.
 
  • Like
Likes physicsxanime
Yes, of course. I am just stupid. Let's shift the energy scale so that the atomic energy at 1s is 0.
Then the Hamiltonian is
$$
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 1 & 1\\
1 & 0 & 1\\
1 & 1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}
$$
The eigenenergies and corresponding eigenvectors are ##\lambda_1 = -1##, ##\lambda_2 = -1##, ##\lambda_3 = 2##, ##v_1 = (-1,0,1)^T##, ##v_2 = (-1,1,0)^T##, ##v_3 = (1,1,1)^T##

Note that ##v_1## and ##v_2## are anti-symmetric while ##v_3## is symmetric.
Therefore, the singlet state is paired up with symmetric state and the lowest eigenvalue is using ##v_1## and ##v_2## or any linear combination of the two on each of the electrons. So this state has eigen value of -2.
Whereas the triplet state is aired up with antisymmetric state and the lowest eigenvalue is using ##v_1## and ##v_2## or any linear combination on one electron and the other one using ##v_3##. Hence, the eigenvalue is 1.

B, hmmm, only some of the singlet state is having large splitting. But anyway, one can use degenerate perturbation theory to prove the assertion, the correction must be of order ##U##, so we know there is a large splitting without doing the calculation. And the large splitting is from singlet state forcing a symmetric spatial state and hence gaining U by putting them on the same site.
 
This is the so called Hubbard Model hamiltonian. For U=0 it reduces to the Hückel hamiltonian.
Note that t is usually negative. Hopping stabilizes the system. The limit U=infinity corresponds to valence bond theory.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DrClaude and pines-demon
So is there some elegant way to do this or am I just supposed to follow my nose and sub the Taylor expansions for terms in the two boost matrices under the assumption ##v,w\ll 1##, then do three ugly matrix multiplications and get some horrifying kludge for ##R## and show that the product of ##R## and its transpose is the identity matrix with det(R)=1? Without loss of generality I made ##\mathbf{v}## point along the x-axis and since ##\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{w} = 0## I set ##w_1 = 0## to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
570
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K