Eigenfunctions and hermitian operators

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 3K views
baldywaldy
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm just a bit stuck on this question:

Write down two equations to represent the fact that a given wavefunction is simultaneously an eiigenfunction of two different hermitian operators. what conclusion can be drawn about these operators?

Im not quite sure how to start it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
baldywaldy said:
Hi. I'm just a bit stuck on this question:

Write down two equations to represent the fact that a given wavefunction is simultaneously an eiigenfunction of two different hermitian operators. what conclusion can be drawn about these operators?

Im not quite sure how to start it.

Thanks!
If [itex]\psi[/itex] is an eigenfunction of the hermitian operator [itex]A_1[/itex], what does this mean? Can you write the eigenvalue problem?
 
is it.

phi|A>= a|A> ?
 
baldywaldy said:
is it.

phi|A>= a|A> ?
Yes. So, we have (preserving the index):

[tex]A_1 \psi = a_1\psi.[/tex]

Suppose we now have a second hermitian operator, [itex]A_2[/itex]. Can you write a similar equation?
 
Hootenanny said:
Yes. So, we have (preserving the index):

[tex]A_1 \psi = a_1\psi.[/tex]

Suppose we now have a second hermitian operator, [itex]A_2[/itex]. Can you write a similar equation?

[tex]A_2 \psi = a_2\psi.[/tex]
 
baldywaldy said:
[tex]A_2 \psi = a_2\psi.[/tex]
Excellent!

So what happens if you first operate on [itex]\psi[/itex] with [itex]A_1[/itex], followed by [itex]A_2[/itex]? Compare this with what happens when you do it the other way round.
 
Hootenanny said:
Excellent!

So what happens if you first operate on [itex]\psi[/itex] with [itex]A_1[/itex], followed by [itex]A_2[/itex]? Compare this with what happens when you do it the other way round.

[itex]A_2[/itex][itex]A_1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex] = [itex]A_2[/itex]([itex]A_1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]) =[itex]A_2[/itex]([itex]a1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex])=[itex]a_1[/itex][itex]A_2[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]= [itex]a_1[/itex][itex]a_2[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]

[itex]A_1[/itex][itex]A_2[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]=[itex]a_2[/itex][itex]a_1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]

Therefore they commute! XD
 
baldywaldy said:
[itex]A_2[/itex][itex]A_1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex] = [itex]A_2[/itex]([itex]A_1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]) =[itex]A_2[/itex]([itex]a1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex])=[itex]a_1[/itex][itex]A_2[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]= [itex]a_1[/itex][itex]a_2[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]

[itex]A_1[/itex][itex]A_2[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]=[itex]a_2[/itex][itex]a_1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]

Therefore they commute! XD
Indeed they do! :approve:
 
Hootenanny said:
Indeed they do! :approve:

Thanks! :Danother similar question to that one I have is :

write down two equations to represent the fact that two different wavefunctions are simultaneously eigenfunctions of the same hermation operator, with different eigenvalues. what conclusion can be drawn about these wavefunctions. So far I have

[itex]A_1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]=[itex]a_1[/itex][itex]\psi[/itex]

[itex]A_1[/itex]θ=[itex]a_1[/itex]θ