Eigenstates, Eigenvalues & Multicplity of Hamiltonian w/ Spin 1/2

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Spin
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
> Consider two particle with spin 1/2 interacting via the hamiltonian $H
= \frac{A}{\hbar^2}S_{1}.S_{2}$, Where A is a constant. What aare the eigenstates, eigenvalues and its multicplity?

$H = \frac{A}{\hbar^2}S_{1}.S_{2} = A\frac{(SS-S_{1}S_{1}-S_{2}S_{2})}{2\hbar^2 } = A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }$

Now, $S_{1}²$, for example, has the same eigenvectors as S1z, that is, $11,10,1-1,00$
And all these states are eigenvectors of S², so we have:

$$H|11\rangle= A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }|11\rangle = A\frac{(2 \hbar^2- 3 \hbar^2/4 -3 \hbar^2/4 )}{2\hbar^2 }|11\rangle = \frac{A}{4}|11\rangle$$

$$H|10\rangle= A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }|10\rangle = A\frac{(2 \hbar^2- 3 \hbar^2/4 -3 \hbar^2/4 )}{2\hbar^2 }|10\rangle = \frac{A}{4}|10\rangle$$

$$H|1-1\rangle= A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }|1-1\rangle = A\frac{(2 \hbar^2- 3 \hbar^2/4 -3 \hbar^2/4 )}{2\hbar^2 }|1-1\rangle = \frac{A}{4}|1-1\rangle$$

$$H|00\rangle= A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }|00\rangle = A\frac{(- 3 \hbar^2/4 -3 \hbar^2/4 )}{2\hbar^2 }|00\rangle = \frac{-3A}{4}|00\rangle$$

I want to know i this is right. Is it? To be honest, i think it is, but what worries me is that i am not sure i these are all the eigenvalues/eigenvectors. I believe H would be something like a "4x4" matrix, so i think it is. But want to hear your answer too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work looks correct to me.

For inline Latex, use double hashtag rather than single dollar sign.
 
Just making it easier to read> Consider two particle with spin 1/2 interacting via the hamiltonian $$H
= \frac{A}{\hbar^2}S_{1}.S_{2}$$, Where A is a constant. What aare the eigenstates, eigenvalues and its multicplity?

$$H = \frac{A}{\hbar^2}S_{1}.S_{2} = A\frac{(SS-S_{1}S_{1}-S_{2}S_{2})}{2\hbar^2 } = A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }$$

Now, $$S_{1}²$$, for example, has the same eigenvectors as S1z, that is, $$11,10,1-1,00$$
And all these states are eigenvectors of S², so we have:
 
Herculi said:
I want to know i this is right. Is it? To be honest, i think it is, but what worries me is that i am not sure i these are all the eigenvalues/eigenvectors. I believe H would be something like a "4x4" matrix, so i think it is. But want to hear your answer too.
The Hamiltonian is indeed a 4×4 matrix. You have found 4 eigenvalues, so what's your concern? A quick test on your eigenvalues to check whether if the Hamiltonian matrix is traceless (the sum of diagonal elements is zero), the sum of the eigenvalues must be zero. That is true in this case which does not guarantee the correctness of your eigenvalues but at least they pass this test so there is no error in the arithmetic.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top