Eigenstates of Dirac Potential in Momentum Space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a particle in one dimension subjected to an attractive Dirac δ-function potential. The Hamiltonian is presented in real space, and participants are tasked with transforming it into momentum space while analyzing the corresponding wavefunctions and eigenstates.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the transformation of the wavefunction from real space to momentum space and discuss the implications of the Dirac potential in this context.
  • There are attempts to clarify the treatment of the potential as an operator and the implications of the energy conditions on the nature of the wavefunction.
  • Questions arise regarding the normalization of constants and the simplification of integrals involved in the calculations.
  • Some participants suggest reconsidering the treatment of the delta potential in the momentum representation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of the potential and the use of integrals, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or resolution of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem deals exclusively with bound states, and there is an emphasis on the conditions under which the constant 'a' is real. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding the symmetry properties of the integrals involved.

Jolb
Messages
417
Reaction score
29

Homework Statement


Consider a particle moving in one dimension and bound to an attractive Dirac δ-function potential located at the origin. Work in units such that m=\hbar=1. The Hamiltonian is given, in real (x) space, by:
H=-\frac{1}{2}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}-\delta (x)

The (non normalized) wavefunction \Psi (x)=<x|\Psi >=e^{-a|x|} is an eigenstate of this potential.

a) What is the corresponding wavefunction in wavevector space, \tilde{\Psi}(k) = <k|\Psi>? (Recall that <x|k>=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{ikx})

b) Transform the Hamiltonian from the real space basis |x> to the wavevector space basis |k>. Observe that the kinetic energy is diagonal in k-space, but the δ-function potential scatters all wavevectors into all wavevectors with equal amplitude.

c) Now show, by direct calculation in wavevector space, that \tilde{\Psi}(k) is an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian that you found in part (b). You may find the following integral of use: \int^\infty_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{1+k^2}=\pi

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
\tilde{\Psi}(k) = <k|\Psi>=\int^\infty_{-\infty}<k|x><x|\Psi>dx=\int^\infty_{-\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-ikx}e^{-a|x|}dx

={Re}\left [2\int^\infty_{0}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-ikx}e^{-ax}dx \right ]={Re}\left [\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\int^\infty_{0}e^{-(ik+a)x}dx \right ]={Re}\left [\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\left (\frac{1}{a+ik} \right ) \right ]=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{a}{a^2+k^2}

All this looks alright to me.

b) Since we're working with units where \hbar=m=1, then \hat{p}=\hat{k}=-i\frac{d}{dx}. So the derivative terms just substitute easily with k. All we need now is to Fourier transform the δ potential:
\tilde{\delta}(k)=\int^\infty_{-\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-ikx}\delta(x)dx = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}
\implies\hat{H}=\frac{1}{2}k^2-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}

This looks okay: term on the left is "diagonal", whereas the term on the right scatters all wavenumbers to another wavenumber without a change in amplitude.

c) This is where I'm realizing something is really screwed up. Obviously we have just changed bases so the wavefunction is still an eigenstate of the potential. But I'm not getting that.
\hat{H}\tilde{\Psi}(k) = \left ( \frac{1}{2}k^2-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \right )\left (\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{a}{a^2+k^2} \right )
But this looks clearly linearly independent from \tilde{\Psi}(k).

Where have I gone wrong? I didn't use the integral they give you, and I bet I need to use it somewhere to get the right answer. But where?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please, any help or comments would be greatly appreciated.

Maybe this should be moved to the Quantum forum, since it is a fundamental problem, just in momentum space rather than position space.
 
Hmm I think the mistake here is where you converted the delta potential to k-representation language. It's not just a Fourier transform - it should look more like
<k|V|\Psi> \; = \int dk' <k|V|k'><k'|\Psi> \; = -\frac{1}{2\pi}\int dk' <k'|\Psi>,
which is where their integral comes in. I think everything will then work out ok. Also you can probably fix the constant a right away by normalization (a=1?).
 
Last edited:
Great! Thanks a lot. I need to remember to treat the potential like an operator, not a ket.
 
Something seems a little off here, though: For the attractive dirac potential well, if E < 0, there is the bound state I believe you have here and a is real, but if E > 0, then the state isn't bound, and a is complex. Then, when you take the Re() part, it's not so simple.

Also, what exactly did you do to simplify the integral between when the limits were (-inf,inf) and (0,inf)?

Thanks!
 
WombRaider said:
Something seems a little off here, though: For the attractive dirac potential well, if E < 0, there is the bound state I believe you have here and a is real, but if E > 0, then the state isn't bound, and a is complex. Then, when you take the Re() part, it's not so simple.

Not sure why you would want to take the real part in this case :confused:

If E>0 we have another standard problem - try searching around for "scattering by a delta function potential".
Also, what exactly did you do to simplify the integral between when the limits were (-inf,inf) and (0,inf)?

Write eikx = cos(kx) + i sin(kx) and take another look at his/her integral. You should find that the imaginary part of the integrand is odd and that the real part of the integrand is even. So it does simplify as advertised.
 
WombRaider said:
Something seems a little off here, though: For the attractive dirac potential well, if E < 0, there is the bound state I believe you have here and a is real, but if E > 0, then the state isn't bound, and a is complex. Then, when you take the Re() part, it's not so simple.

Also, what exactly did you do to simplify the integral between when the limits were (-inf,inf) and (0,inf)?

Thanks!

I forgot to mention that this problem deals exclusively with bound states. The constant a is real, so the wavefunction given above part a is for a bound state.

Oxvillian is right about the integral trick: the i sin term is odd and the the e-a|x| is even, so whatever it contributes to the integral will be odd, so it cancels by symmetry. You only get a contribution from the cosine term, which is even, so notice the two. I guess you don't actually need to take the real part.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K