Eigenstates/values of jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian

  • Thread starter Thread starter Millertron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the eigenstates and energy eigenvalues of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, represented as \(\hat{H} = \hbar \omega \left(\hat{a}\hat{a}^{*} + 1/2 \right) + \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}\hat{\sigma}_{z}}{2} + \hbar g (\hat{\sigma}_{+}\hat{a} + \hat{\sigma}_{-}\hat{a}^{*})\). Participants detail the process of applying the Hamiltonian to the states \(|g,n\rangle\) and \(|e,n-1\rangle\), calculating matrix elements, and setting up the eigenvalue problem through the determinant equation \(\text{det}(H - \lambda I) = 0\). The discussion also introduces the use of rotation matrices to simplify the diagonalization process, ultimately leading to the dressed states \(|\pm n\rangle\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Jaynes-Cummings Model (JCM)
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of matrix diagonalization techniques
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of eigenstates in the Jaynes-Cummings Model
  • Learn about the properties of rotation matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of dressed states in quantum optics
  • Practice matrix diagonalization using examples from quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers focusing on quantum optics and cavity quantum electrodynamics will benefit from this discussion.

Millertron
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The JCM has the Hamiltonian:

[itex]\hat{H} = \hbar \omega \left(\hat{a}\hat{a}^{*} + 1/2 \right) + \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}\hat{\sigma}_{z}}{2} + \hbar g (\hat{\sigma}_{+}\hat{a} + \hat{\sigma}_{-}\hat{a}^{*}[/itex]

Find the eigenstates and energy eigenvalues in this non-resonant case assuming n excitations in the system.

The Attempt at a Solution



I initially thought this would be fairly simple (and I'm sure it is...). Firstly, I applied the Hamiltonian to the states |g,n> and |e,n-1>:

[itex]\hat{H} \left|g,n\right\rangle = \hbar\omega(n+1/2) \left|g,n\right\rangle - \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}}{2} \left|g,n\right\rangle + \hbar g \sqrt{n} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle[/itex]

[itex]\hat{H} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle = \hbar\omega(n-1/2) \left|e,n-1\right\rangle + \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}}{2} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle + \hbar g \sqrt{n} \left|g,n\right\rangle[/itex]

I also found the matrix elements

[itex]\left\langle g,n \right| \hat{H} \left|g,n\right\rangle = \hbar\omega(n+1/2) - \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}}{2}[/itex]

[itex]\left\langle e,n-1 \right| \hat{H} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle = \hbar\omega(n-1/2) + \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}}{2}[/itex]

[itex]\left\langle e,n-1 \right| \hat{H} \left|g,n\right\rangle = \hbar g \sqrt{n}[/itex]

[itex]\left\langle g,n \right| \hat{H} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle = \hbar g \sqrt{n}[/itex]

Here's where I start to get lost. I put the matrix elements into a matrix, and then my natural reaction would be to get the eigenvalues via det(H-Iλ) = 0. I think I need to diagonalise the matrix, only I'm very rusty at this... Find the eigenvalues, then put them into a 2x2 diagonal matrix? Also, I was told I may want to use the rotation matrix:

[itex]\left(\stackrel{cos(\theta)}{-sin(\theta)} \stackrel{sin(\theta)}{cos(\theta)} \right)[/itex]

Which, to be honest, has just confused me... (Also how do I put a matrix into latek?!)

I know I'm looking for the dressed states |± n>, and I know these are related to the eigenvalues (obviously...). Argh. I know I'm close but can't quite think of the last few steps!

Any help would be VERY much appreciated! Assignment due in the near future and I'm in dire need of sleep...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hm, it's been a while since I solved any JC Hamiltonian problems, but I'll try to help out.

To diagonalize a 2x2 matrix by the method you suggest, calculating the values for which ##\mbox{det}(H-\lambda I) = 0##, you just need to remember that the determinant of a 2x2 determinant is

$$\left|\begin{array}{c c}a & b \\ c & d\end{array}\right| = ad-bc.$$

Applying this to your 2x2 matrix will give you a quadratic polynomial in ##\lambda## to solve for. Then, to find the eigenvectors, you plug each of the eigenvalues back into ##H-\lambda I## and find a vector which gives zero when you apply ##H-\lambda I## to it.

You can then diagonalize the hamiltonian as ## H = P^{-1} D P##, where D is a diagonal matrix with the eigenvalues on the diagonal and P is a matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors you just calculated. (The order of the columns corresponds to the order of the eigenvalues in the columns in D).

The suggestion to use a rotation matrix comes in as a shortcut for some of the above: you know that your eigenvalues in the 2d space will be linear combinations of ##|g,n\rangle## and ##|e,n-1\rangle##; you can parametrize the eigenvectors as

$$|\psi_1\rangle = \cos \theta |g,n\rangle + \sin\theta |e,n-1\rangle \\ |\psi_2\rangle = \cos \theta |g,n\rangle - \sin\theta |e,n-1\rangle.$$

You chose the angle ##\theta## by calculating the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian in this basis and choosing the angle such that the off-diagonal terms are zero.

This will ultimately get you the same result as the other diagonalization procedure, except that here you can skip the finding the eigenvalues and you can probably find the eigenvectors more quickly. Basically, you'll find that the matrix P in the first method can be written as a rotation matrix.

To write a matrix using LaTeX, I write

Code:
\left(\begin{array}{c c}a & b \\ c & d\end{array}\right)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K