Eigenvalues / Eigenvectors relationship to Matrix Entries Values

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the entries of a matrix and its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, particularly in the context of linear algebra and spectral theory. Participants explore various properties and theorems that may describe how changes in matrix entries affect eigenvalues and eigenvectors, including specific cases such as matrices with entries less than 1, modulus less than 1, or entries tending to infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a theorem that clarifies the dependence between matrix entries and eigenvalues/eigenvectors, mentioning specific cases of interest.
  • Another participant suggests the Gershgorin circle theorem as a potentially useful result, though acknowledges it may not fully meet the original inquiry.
  • A participant highlights the Perron–Frobenius theorem as a relevant clue for understanding eigenvalue behavior in certain matrices.
  • It is noted that small changes in matrix entries can lead to large changes in eigenvalues and eigenvectors, indicating instability in the eigensystem, particularly for non-hermitian matrices.
  • A participant describes their interest in the spectral decomposition of a Laplacian matrix and its implications for wavelet analysis, emphasizing the need to understand how eigenvalues depend on matrix entries.
  • Another participant mentions the Schur-Horn theorem as a possible related concept, though its relevance to the original question is uncertain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints and propose different theorems and concepts, indicating that multiple competing views remain regarding the relationship between matrix entries and eigenvalues/eigenvectors. The discussion does not reach a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topic, with references to specific theorems and properties that may not fully address the original questions posed. There are indications of unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on definitions that are not clarified in the discussion.

jorgejgleandro
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, folks

I have had a hard time to find out whether or not there is a theorem in Linear Algebra or Spectral Theory that makes any strong statement about the relationship between the entries of a Matrix and its Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors.

Indeed, I would like to know how is the dependence between a matrix entries and its eigenvalues / eigenvectors. It could be something describing:
- what are the properties of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix whose entries are less than 1 and greater than 0.
- what are the properties of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix whose entries modulus are less than 1
- what are the properties of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix whose entries goes to infinity

I'm studying spectral decomposition of matrices and would like to predict what will happen with the eigenvectors, given a diferent set of values for the Matrix entries.

I would appreciate any valuable reference with hints on that.

Regards,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AlephZero said:
This might be less than you hoped for, but it's a useful result: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gershgorin_circle_theorem

Thanks, AlephZero.
I've just had a quick glimpse over it and suspect it looks like being far more than I expect, indeed. However, among the links for similar theorems at the bottom of that page, there is the Perron–Frobenius theorem, which appears to be a good clue towards the right track.

I'm going to look into these theorems and return, in case they don't suit my needs.

Regards.
 
One interesting property of matrix eigenproblems is that a small change in the matrix entries can sometimes cause a large change in the eigenvectors and eigenvalues. Then we say that the eigensystem is unstable. What I mean is that the eigenvalues of, say, matrices
##\left[\begin{smallmatrix}1&2\\3&4\end{smallmatrix}\right]## and ##\left[\begin{smallmatrix}1&2.01\\3&4\end{smallmatrix}\right]##
are not necessarily close to each other. It can be shown that eigensystems with hermitian matrices are stable, though.
 
hilbert2 said:
One interesting property of matrix eigenproblems is that a small change in the matrix entries can sometimes cause a large change in the eigenvectors and eigenvalues. Then we say that the eigensystem is unstable. What I mean is that the eigenvalues of, say, matrices
##\left[\begin{smallmatrix}1&2\\3&4\end{smallmatrix}\right]## and ##\left[\begin{smallmatrix}1&2.01\\3&4\end{smallmatrix}\right]##
are not necessarily close to each other. It can be shown that eigensystems with hermitian matrices are stable, though.

Yeah, I'm after something like you've described, Hilbert2.

Let me describe the big picture of the question for which I've been looking for an answer.

Given a non-normalized Laplacian matrix L of a Graph (this matrix is a symmetric real-valued matrix - a special case of Hermitian matrices), which are known to have real eigenvalues and an orthonormal set of eigenvectors, I want to carry out a wavelet analysis on it through the SGWT of [Hammond et al, 2009]. After its spectral decomposition, it's possible to use the Functional Calculus to evaluate a kernel g(\lambda * t) in the spectral domain on every L eigenvalue.

I wish I could analytically demonstrate how the Spectral Graph Wavelet Transform values depend on the L matrix entries. However, I think it's necessary to show how the L eigenvalues depend on the L entries beforehand.

Regards
 
The first idea that came to mind while reading your post was the Schur-Horn theorem. I'm not sure if it helps, but perhaps related literature will help guide you to what you need.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K