Eigenvalues of a reduced density matrix

Click For Summary
A density matrix representing a pure state has only one non-zero eigenvalue equal to one, but this holds true only in the diagonal basis of the matrix. An example provided, \(\rho_A = \begin{pmatrix} 1/2 & -1/2 \\ -1/2 & 1/2 \end{pmatrix}\), does not appear to meet this criterion until it is expressed in its diagonal form. The discussion suggests that a pure state can be represented as \(\rho = |\psi_i\rangle \langle \psi_i|\), where the eigenvalues correspond to the projections onto the eigenvectors. Clarification is sought on whether the eigenstates need to be orthogonal and how this concept generalizes to higher dimensions. Ultimately, the consensus is that the statement about eigenvalues pertains specifically to the basis of the eigenvectors.
barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
My lecturer keeps telling me that if a density matrix describes a pure state then it must contain only one non-zero eigenvalue which is equal to one. However I can't see how this is true, particularly as I have seen a matrix \rho_A = \begin{pmatrix} 1/2 & - 1/2 \\ -1/2 & 1/2 \\ \end{pmatrix} for which this is not true. He then clarified that if it was in "the diagonal basis" this was true. Can someone clarify this for me or show me a proof please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess he means that you can write a density matrix as
\rho = | \psi_i \rangle \langle \psi_i |
Which has eigenvalues \delta_{ij} since
\rho |\psi_j \rangle = \delta_{ij} |\psi_i \rangle.
The example you gave can be written as \rho = | - \rangle \langle - |, where | - \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix}1 \\ -1\end{pmatrix} which has | - \rangle as an eigenvector, with eigenvalue 1.
 
Is that true? I thought $\psi_i \rangle$ and $\psi_j \rangle$ weren't necessarily orthogonal. He also definitely said that when it's pure it only has one non-zero eigenvalue. Maybe he means only in the basis of its eigenvectors, I don't know? That's what I'm trying to find out.
 
Yeah I think it is the basis of its eigenvectors. I think you can always take a pure state as one possible basis vector. E.g. if you have |\psi_a \rangle = \alpha |0 \rangle + \beta |1 \rangle then the other one is |\psi_b \rangle = \alpha |0 \rangle - \beta |1 \rangle. I can't remember if/how this generalizes to higher dimensions though. :blushing: Maybe Gram-Schmidt?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K