Eigenvalues of a spin-orbit Hamiltonian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a Hamiltonian representing an electron gas with spin-orbit interaction. The Hamiltonian includes a term that raises questions about its hermiticity and the implications of imaginary eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the eigenvalue equation derived from the Hamiltonian, questioning the hermiticity of the spin-orbit term and the presence of imaginary components in the eigenvalues. There are attempts to clarify the implications of these findings and the correct formulation of the Hamiltonian.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights on the hermiticity of the Hamiltonian and suggesting that the problem may contain a typo. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of the imaginary terms in the eigenvalues and are considering reaching out to the professor for clarification.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that the original problem statement may have inaccuracies, particularly regarding the parameters involved in the Hamiltonian. Participants are navigating these uncertainties while discussing the mathematical formulation.

IanBerkman
Messages
52
Reaction score
1
Good day everyone,

The question is as following:


Consider an electron gas with Hamiltonian:
\mathcal{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2 \nabla^2}{2m} + \alpha (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \nabla)

where α parameterizes a model spin-orbit interaction. Compute the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of wave vector k and plot them in the x-direction. Interpret the results.


Relevant equations:

σ is given by the Pauli matrices:
\boldsymbol{\sigma} = (\sigma_x, \sigma_y, \sigma_z)
\sigma_x = \left(\begin{matrix} 0&1\\1&0\end{matrix}\right),
\sigma_y = \left(\begin{matrix} 0&-i\\i&0\end{matrix}\right),
\sigma_z = \left(\begin{matrix} 1&0\\0&-1\end{matrix}\right)

Attempt at the solution:

I started with calling the eigenvector as following:
|\Psi> = Ae^{i\textbf{k}\cdot \textbf{r}}|\psi> ,
which need to fulfill the eigenvalue equation:
\mathcal{H}|\Psi> = E|\Psi>.
This eigenvector gives the following:
\mathcal{H}|\Psi> = Ae^{i\textbf{k}\cdot \textbf{r}}\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}|\psi> +Ae^{i\textbf{k}\cdot \textbf{r}}\alpha i(\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \textbf{k})|\psi> = E\cdot Ae^{i\textbf{k}\cdot \textbf{r}}|\psi>,
where
\alpha i(\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \textbf{k}) = \left(\begin{matrix} \alpha i k_z & \alpha i k_x + \alpha k_y\\ \alpha i k_x - \alpha k_y & -\alpha i k_z \end{matrix}\right).
This can then be reduced to a matrix eigenvalue equation:
\begin{align*}E|\psi> &= \left(\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} +\alpha i (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \textbf{k})\right)|\psi>\\ E|\psi> &= \left(\begin{matrix} \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} + \alpha i k_z & \alpha i k_x + \alpha k_y \\ \alpha i k_x - \alpha k_y & \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} - \alpha i k_z \end{matrix}\right)|\psi>\end{align*}

However, this matrix gives the eigenvalues:
E_1 = \frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m} + \alpha i k \\<br /> E_2 = \frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m} - \alpha i k

Which look quite right, except that they contain imaginary parts which suggest some form of energy loss/damping which is not stated in the problem.

Did anybody see where I went wrong?

Thanks in advance,

Ian Berkman
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second term in your Hamiltonian doesn't appear to be hermitian? Other than that your steps seem fine.
 
Do you mean the αi(σ⋅k) term?
I have checked that term couple of times, but I cannot see where it went wrong.

I could try to solve it with the function
|\Psi&gt; = A e^{\textbf{k} \cdot \textbf{r}}|\psi&gt;

Which gives a Hermitian operator, however, as far as I see, it also gives a negative h2k2/2m term in the energy eigenvalue. Furthermore, I cannot remember having ever seen such a function.
 
Last edited:
Nevermind the function in my comment above, it is not right.
 
Last edited:
The spin-orbit term isn't hermitian because of the ##\nabla##. Shouldn't it be written in terms of the momentum, which will supply a factor of ##i##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blue_leaf77
Well, you have the right eigenvalues, eigenvalues should be real in this case. Choosing ##\alpha## imaginary would do the trick. I suspect your problem has a typo.
 
IanBerkman said:
Do you mean the αi(σ⋅k) term?

Yes, interesting it appears with an ##i## here but not in your original problem statement.
 
The i appears in the second term because of the gradient of e^(ikr).
I am going to mail the professor if alpha could be an imaginary value, however, I would say that that would be stated in the problem if that is the case.
 
vela said:
The spin-orbit term isn't hermitian because of the ##\nabla##. Shouldn't it be written in terms of the momentum, which will supply a factor of ##i##?

The extra factor of ##i## should also appear when ##\alpha## could only take an imaginary value. Also, a momentum operator fits better in a spin-orbit Hamiltonian.

I think indeed this problem has a typo, I will keep you informed about the professor's reply.
 
  • #10
The problem was indeed incorrectly stated. Well, sometimes these things happen.

Thank you all for helping.

Ian
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K