MHB Eigenvalues of Laplacian are non-negative

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that for a vector x in R^n, the equation x.Lx=0.5 sum(Aij(xi-xj)^2 holds true, where A is the adjacency matrix and L is the Laplacian. The user seeks assistance in understanding this proof and its implications for demonstrating that the eigenvalues of L are non-negative for indices 1<j<n. The importance of posting questions in the correct subforum to avoid duplication of effort is also emphasized. The community aims to provide valuable help efficiently. Overall, the thread highlights a mathematical inquiry related to graph theory and eigenvalue properties.
tarnat
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need to learn the following proof and I'm having trouble getting my head round it. Any help would be appreciated.

Show that if vector x in R^n with components x=(x1,x2,...,xn), then
x.Lx=0.5 sum(Aij(xi-xj)^2)
where A is the graphs adjacency matrix, L is laplacian.
Then use this result to prove that the eigen values of L are non-zero for all 1<j<n.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have deleted the duplicate of this thread posted in the Discrete Mathematics subforum.

We ask that a question be posted only once and in the appropriate subforum. This eliminates the possibility of duplication of effort on the part of our helpers, whose time is valuable. :D
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K