Einstein & Lambda: 1917 Static Model Review

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Lambda
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on Einstein's 1917 Static Model of the Universe and the implications of the cosmological constant, denoted as lambda (Λ), as detailed in the paper "Einstein's 1917 Static Model of the Universe: A Centennial Review." The introduction of lambda sparked significant debate among physicists, reflecting Einstein's ambivalence towards a static universe throughout his life. While lambda allowed for the prediction of an expanding universe, it also highlighted the instability of a static universe against gravitational collapse. The discussion raises questions about the viability of alternative theories that oppose the observational evidence of an expanding universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's field equations
  • Familiarity with the concept of the cosmological constant (lambda, Λ)
  • Knowledge of gravitational collapse in cosmology
  • Awareness of historical debates in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the cosmological constant in modern cosmology
  • Explore alternative theories to the expanding universe, such as static universe models
  • Study the historical context of Einstein's theories and their reception by contemporaries
  • Investigate current observational evidence supporting an expanding universe
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, historians of science, and anyone interested in the evolution of theories regarding the universe's structure and expansion.

Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
750
This paper; https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.07261, Einstein's 1917 Static Model of the Universe: A Centennial Review, offers an informative insight into the mind of Einstein and, to large extent, his motivation for adding the cosmological constant to his field equations. Interestingly, both the introduction of lambda, and his subsequent repudiation, inspired controversy among from his peers. Though the basic idea had been around for decades, it had never been expressed quite so eloquently. The paper goes on to address the issues he was attempting to resolve with lambda. The jury is still out on whether or not it was justified. It is clear, however, Einstein was deeply ambivalent towards lambda for the remainder of his life. While lambda may have enabled Einstein to predict the expansion of the universe, it mainly served to resurrect an issue well known and argued since the time of Newton - that a static universe was unstable against gravitational collapse.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith and DrClaude
Space news on Phys.org
I tend to sympathize with Einstein's dislike for a non-static universe. It really complicates an otherwise orderly and sensible universe. Are there any viable theories still standing against observational evidence of an expanding universe without being bent into a pretzel?
 
Chronos said:
Are there any viable theories still standing against observational evidence of an expanding universe without being bent into a pretzel?

Not that I'm aware of.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
4K