Einstein Notation for Stored Energy Function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
singularme
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I encounter the following formula (for stain energy function) a lot in physics literature:

[itex] W(\epsilon_{kl}) = \int_0^{\epsilon_{kl}} \sigma_{ij} \textrm{d}\epsilon_{ij}[/itex]

where all indices ranges from 1 to 3, both [itex]\epsilon[/itex] and [itex]\sigma[/itex] are 3x3 matrices.

My question is what exactly does it mean in non-Einstein notation? Is it an abuse of notation? Because when I see [itex]W(\epsilon_{kl})=\cdots[/itex], I feel it should interpreted as 9 separate equations (with [itex]kl[/itex] replaced by 11, 12, 13, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 33), which does not make sense in this case.

Thanks a lot!
James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello James! Welcome to PF! :smile:
singularme said:
… when I see [itex]W(\epsilon_{kl})=\cdots[/itex], I feel it should interpreted as 9 separate equations (with [itex]kl[/itex] replaced by 11, 12, 13, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 33), which does not make sense in this case.

No, it does make sense!

W(εkl) = … is nine separate equations in Einstein notation.

The i and j on the RHS are "dummy" indices, but the k and l on both the RHS and LHS are not "dummy" indices. :wink: