Einstein Notation for Stored Energy Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interpretation of the strain energy function formula in Einstein notation: W(εkl) = ∫0εkl σijij. Participants clarify that while W(εkl) may appear to represent nine separate equations, it actually signifies a single equation with k and l as non-dummy indices, while i and j serve as dummy indices. This distinction is crucial for understanding the application of Einstein notation in continuum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein summation convention
  • Familiarity with strain energy functions in continuum mechanics
  • Knowledge of tensor notation and matrix operations
  • Basic principles of physics related to stress and strain
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Einstein notation in tensor calculus
  • Explore the derivation of strain energy functions in continuum mechanics
  • Learn about dummy and non-dummy indices in tensor equations
  • Investigate applications of strain energy functions in material science
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students in mechanical engineering or materials science who are working with continuum mechanics and tensor analysis will benefit from this discussion.

singularme
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I encounter the following formula (for stain energy function) a lot in physics literature:

[itex] W(\epsilon_{kl}) = \int_0^{\epsilon_{kl}} \sigma_{ij} \textrm{d}\epsilon_{ij}[/itex]

where all indices ranges from 1 to 3, both [itex]\epsilon[/itex] and [itex]\sigma[/itex] are 3x3 matrices.

My question is what exactly does it mean in non-Einstein notation? Is it an abuse of notation? Because when I see [itex]W(\epsilon_{kl})=\cdots[/itex], I feel it should interpreted as 9 separate equations (with [itex]kl[/itex] replaced by 11, 12, 13, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 33), which does not make sense in this case.

Thanks a lot!
James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello James! Welcome to PF! :smile:
singularme said:
… when I see [itex]W(\epsilon_{kl})=\cdots[/itex], I feel it should interpreted as 9 separate equations (with [itex]kl[/itex] replaced by 11, 12, 13, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 33), which does not make sense in this case.

No, it does make sense!

W(εkl) = … is nine separate equations in Einstein notation.

The i and j on the RHS are "dummy" indices, but the k and l on both the RHS and LHS are not "dummy" indices. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
30K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K