Eisenstein's Criterion question.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Omukara
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying Eisenstein's Criterion to determine the irreducibility of the polynomial x^43 + 43x + 85 over the rational numbers Q. The substitution x |-> x + 1 is utilized to demonstrate that all coefficients of the transformed polynomial (x+1)^43 + 43(x+1) + 85 are multiples of 43, confirming its irreducibility. Additionally, the polynomial x^36 + 36x^8 - 405 is addressed, with a substitution y = x^8 simplifying it to a quadratic equation, making factorization straightforward.

PREREQUISITES
  • Eisenstein's Criterion for irreducibility
  • Polynomial substitution techniques
  • Quadratic equations and their factorization
  • Understanding of rational numbers (Q)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Eisenstein's Criterion in detail with various examples
  • Explore polynomial substitution methods for irreducibility proofs
  • Learn about factorization techniques for quadratic equations
  • Investigate other irreducibility criteria beyond Eisenstein's
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone interested in polynomial theory and irreducibility proofs.

Omukara
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a couple questions concerning Eisenstein's Criterion;

1) by making a substitution of the form x |-> x + a, show x^43 + 43x + 85 is irreducible over Q.

2) completely factorize into monic irreducible factors over Q for x^36 + 36x^8 - 405.I've only come across other examples to these which could be solved by recognizing that the polynomial resembled something similar to the binomial expansion of the form (x + 1)^n, but in these cases I cannot see how that would work.

Help would be, as always, much appreciated:)

(edit: sorry, only the first question is concerned with E's criterion, but help for either would be fantastic:])
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Omukara! :smile:

For (1), what happens to the polynomial after you substitute (x+1) for x. Does that polynomial satisfy Eisensteins criterion?
 
hmm, I did consider (x+1)^43 + 43(x+1) + 85 at one point, but my lack of intuition makes it hard for me to understand why we make the substitution, since, if I'm not mistaken; if we take the prime p=43, immediately we can see E's criterion is satisfied.

Ah, I think I just had a light bulb moment after reading your comment a few more times:) we make the substitution to explicitly show that for all the coefficients of x of order between 42 and 1, E's criterion is satisfied since all such coefficients in (x+1)^43 will be a multiple of 43. So it follows that if it is irreducible for the substituion x+1, it is irreducible for x

Thank you so much!^_^EDIT: Just realized I wrote down the question incorrectly for question 2), the leading x was supposed to be of order 16, so it's more do-able now. Apologies!
 
Last edited:
Omukara said:
EDIT: Just realized I wrote down the question incorrectly for question 2), the leading x was supposed to be of order 16, so it's more do-able now. Apologies!

That doesn't only make it more doable, that makes it quite easy! First, do a substitution y=x8. You'll obtain a quadratic equation, and these kind of equations are easy to factorize!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
20K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K