Electric potential energy of two charged spheres

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the velocities of two charged insulating spheres with radii of 0.3 cm and 0.5 cm, masses of 0.1 kg and 0.7 kg, and charges of -2 µC and 3 µC, respectively, when they collide after being released from a distance of 1 m. The conservation of energy principle is emphasized, stating that the electric potential energy lost by the system equals the total kinetic energy gained by both spheres. The radius of the spheres is relevant for calculating potential energy, but does not affect the conservation equations directly. If the spheres were conducting, charge redistribution complicates the problem significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential energy and kinetic energy conservation
  • Familiarity with the principles of momentum conservation
  • Knowledge of electrostatics, specifically Coulomb's law
  • Basic algebra for solving equations involving multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy in electrostatic systems
  • Learn about the effects of charge distribution in conducting spheres
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of electric potential energy for spherical charge distributions
  • Investigate the implications of charge polarization during collisions of conductive objects
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and dynamics of charged particles will benefit from this discussion.

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
Two insulating spheres have radii 0.3cm and 0.5cm, masses 0.1kg and 0.7kg and uniformly distributed charges of -2 \muC and 3 \muC. they are released when the distance from their center are 1m apart. How fast will each be moving when they collide.

Firstly, what is the radius of the sphere use for? Secondly, I calculated the electric potential energy of the system but what is this energy equivalent to? Lastly, how can we solve this question if the spheres were conducting spheres?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, well, first let me say that I'm not sure how to answer your question, but I would like to think through it a bit myself. The electrical potential energy at the beginning should be equal to the sum of the kinetic energies of the spheres at the end. I think conservation of momentum still holds, so using the energy and momentum equations I think one should be able to calculate both velocities. I'm not sure how the radius of the spheres comes into play either. It would affect the potential energy of each spherical charge distribution, but that doesn't seem like it should be relevant to me since the spheres aren't changing, so we can set our zero of potential energy at the total potential energy inherent within the spheres. If the spheres were conducting, it seems to me that the charge on each sphere should redistribute itself such that field is zero and the spheres don't move. Is this possible?

Sorry for the long, useless response, but I would like an answer to your question as well!

Kelly
 
That's what I had in mind at first, so do you think the energy lost by the system is equivalent to the kinetic energy gain by the sphere? So can we treat one sphere as stationary and just calculate the relative velocity of the moving sphere? I think if the spheres are conducting they would polarize each other as they move together?
 
semc said:
Firstly, what is the radius of the sphere use for? Secondly, I calculated the electric potential energy of the system but what is this energy equivalent to? Lastly, how can we solve this question if the spheres were conducting spheres?

The radii are used for calculating the potential energy of the system after the collision. The electric potential energy isn't equal to anything, but the difference in electric potential energy is equal to the total kinetic energy of the system, since total energy is conserved.

If the spheres were conducting, the separation of charges would make the problem much harder to solve. I don't think the solution is trivial.
 
semc said:
That's what I had in mind at first, so do you think the energy lost by the system is equivalent to the kinetic energy gain by the sphere? So can we treat one sphere as stationary and just calculate the relative velocity of the moving sphere?

The potential energy lost by the system is equal to the kinetic energy gained by TWO spheres. You can't treat one sphere as stationary because in any inertial reference frame, it isn't.

I think if the spheres are conducting they would polarize each other as they move together?

Yes. That would make the problem extremely difficult to solve.
 
So if we use \DeltaU = \frac{1}{2}m1v12 +\frac{1}{2}m2v22 and conservation of momentum m1v1= -m2v2 simultaneously is able to solve it? I am not able to get the answer?
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's how you do it. You should be able to get an answer. How did you try to solve the equations?
 
ke \frac{Qq}{r^2}= \frac{1}{2} m1v12 + \frac{1}{2m2} (m1v1)2
The distance r is 1m?

I gotten v1 to be 0.793m/s but its not the answer. So how do we use the radius of the sphere?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K