Electro-chemical degradation of stainless steel wire in my garden Slug-o-Cuter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Techno_Gardener
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a DIY solution for managing slugs in a garden near Seattle, where the user has developed a circuit that delivers brief pulses of 18V DC through stainless steel wires to eliminate slugs. The user notes that while stainless steel outperforms other materials like tinned copper and galvanized steel in terms of durability, the wires still become brittle after one or two seasons, likely due to corrosion from the DC current interacting with the soil. The user is considering whether alternating the voltage polarity could reduce corrosion, acknowledging that while it may slow the process, it won't completely prevent it. They plan to conduct an experiment to compare corrosion rates between alternating voltage and DC. The conversation also touches on natural slug predators, with suggestions of using animals like toads, snakes, and birds as alternative slug control methods, highlighting that toads are primary predators of slugs.
Techno_Gardener
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
My wife is an avid gardener in Puget Sound area near Seattle. But we have a lot of slugs. If you hit a slug with a brief (~2 seconds) pulse of 18V DC, the slug is finished...

I am an electronic engineer and I designed-built a circuit to produce these pulses (1/8 duty cycle) to AWG20 stainless steel wires, laid about 1/2 inch apart, across the top of the garden soil like railroad tracks. Stainless steel seems to last better than tinned copper wire or galvanized steel wire, both of which I tried before stainless steel. But after 1 or 2 seasons of this nonsense the wire becomes brittle and breaks. I expect that that every voltage pulse results in some current from the wire through the soil, depending upon moisture and natural chemicals in the soil.

I am wondering if the DC current in fact is doing this, and whether a more complicated design to alternate the polarity of the successive pulses might reduce or eliminate the wire corrosion? I did try subjecting a slug to high frequency voltage (about 25 KHz) and the slug was not affected at all, so far as I could see. That would have been slightly easier but is apparently not an option. But given that a single pulse of DC seems to terminate the slug, I do not think that alternating the voltage polarity between pulses would hurt the functionality.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Basic electrochemistry tells galvanic corrosion is inevitable in such conditions. To avoid it in small lab systems electrodes are made of some noble metal, like gold or platinum (but even then electrode pitting is still possible, depending on voltages involved)

Alternating voltages won't stop the process. It can slow it, but the only sure way to check is an experiment.
 
Thank you, Borek. In my situation, it might be more economical to fly in fresh vegetables daily rather than to plate my wires with enough gold. :-( Before someone steals the wire.

I am setting up an experiment to slowly alternate the voltage and compare corrosion results with DC. I will see what happens.....
 
What if you just hired a toad, snake, duck, chicken, raccoon, beetle, turtle, shrew or bird?
 
We do have garter snakes around. Those are busy enough making garter belts. But beyond that I will duck your question and chicken out of any attempts to cooperate with a raccoon. Do those eat slugs?
 
Techno_Gardener said:
We do have garter snakes around. Those are busy enough making garter belts. But beyond that I will duck your question and chicken out of any attempts to cooperate with a raccoon. Do those eat slugs?
Apparently so. Apperently, toads are their primary predator though.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top