Electrochemical Cells, Cell Potentials: Using Nernst Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the equilibrium constant for the reaction Sn2+(aq) + Ni(s) → Sn(s) + Ni2+(aq) using the Nernst Equation. The standard reduction potentials for Ni2+ and Sn2+ are -0.23 V and -0.14 V, respectively. The total standard potential (E°) is calculated as -0.09 V by combining the reduction potentials. The equilibrium constant is ultimately determined to be 1.1 x 10^3, utilizing the relationship between Gibbs Free Energy and the equilibrium constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Nernst Equation and its application
  • Knowledge of standard reduction potentials
  • Familiarity with Gibbs Free Energy concepts
  • Basic principles of electrochemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Nernst Equation in detail, focusing on its derivation and applications
  • Learn how to calculate Gibbs Free Energy and its relationship to equilibrium constants
  • Explore electrochemical cell design and its implications on cell potential
  • Investigate the impact of concentration changes on cell potential using the Nernst Equation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in chemistry, particularly those studying electrochemistry, as well as anyone involved in laboratory work related to electrochemical cells and their applications.

Gaunt101
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The standard reduction potentials for Ni2+ and Sn2+ are as follows:
Ni2+ + 2e− → Ni E° = −0.23 V
Sn2+ + 2e− → Sn E° = −0.14 V

Calculate the equilibrium constant at 25°C for the reaction Sn2+(aq) + Ni(s)→ Sn(s) + Ni2+(aq)


Homework Equations



Nernst Equation
E = E0- (0.0592/n)*log10Q



The Attempt at a Solution



I thought this would be a simple problem by just plugging the relevant values into the Nernst Equation, however there is no value for E. There are two reduction potential values for the half reactions which we can calculate the total reducing potential as E0 = Eanode+ Ecathode = 0.14V + (-)0.23 = -0.09

This is due to the fact that you have to reverse one of the equations to change the sign so you can account for the oxidation / reduction pair. In this case, it can be seen that Sn2+ (tin) was being reduced, so I decided to reverse the equation and make it positive.

At this point I'm unsure of how to calculate the equilibrium constant because without an E value, there is no possible way of re-arranging the equation to find a suitable value. I don't think I"m missing a condition, we're not told whether the concentrations of reactants and proudcts are standard so we can't assume that E = E0.

Any help would be much appreciated, thank you very much!

Gaunt.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Terribly sorry, I have worked this out. Just found the relationship between Gibbs Free and the equilibrium constant, rather than the reaction quotient.

Sorry!

THe answer is 1.1*10^3
 
No need to be sorry - we prefer those that try by themselves over those waiting for a spoon feeding :smile:

Note that you could easily solve this problem just assuming potentials of both half reactions are equal at equilibrium:

-0.23 + \frac {RT}{2F} ln([Ni^{2+}]) = -0.14 + \frac {RT}{2F} ln([Sn^{2+}])

It can be easily rearranged to the form

ln(\frac{[Ni^{2+}]}{[Sn^{2+}]}) = \frac {nF(0.23-0.14)}{RT}

or (using simplified version of the equation):

log_{10}(\frac{[Ni^{2+}]}{[Sn^{2+}]}) = \frac {2\times(0.23-0.14)}{0.059}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K