Electrochemistry - Standard Cell Potentials

AI Thread Summary
Standard cell potential indicates the tendency of a reaction to occur, with a positive value suggesting spontaneity, but it does not directly correlate with reaction rate. The standard cell potential is measured against a reference potential of 0 V, typically using the hydrogen electrode. Even if one reaction has a higher potential, it does not necessarily generate more electrons; instead, both reactions can produce the same number of electrons but with different energy levels. The equilibrium constant (K) is related to the cell potential, where a higher potential indicates a greater tendency for products to form, but the actual charge transferred may not differ significantly between reactions. Ultimately, the standard cell potential reflects energetic feasibility rather than the quantity of charge transferred.
nothing123
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Just having a little trouble understanding the concept of standard cell potential...what is it exactly? I understand that it is compared to a reference potential of 0 for the reaction 2H+ + 2e- -> H2(g). But what does it mean when a given reaction has positive potential (other than the fact that it's spontaneous)? For example, if a given reaction (A -> A2+ + 2e-) has a cell potential of 2V, does that mean the electrons and positive ions in the reaction actually generate a potential of 2 volts (at least relative to the reference potential)?

One of the questions I encountered asked something like this: "Given the following 2 reactions, which one generates more electrons for the circuit when both reactions run to completion (assume standard conditions and same starting concentrations)"?

A --> A2+ + 2e-, E* = 1.00
B --> B2+ + 2e-. E* = 2.00

Apparently, they generate the same number of electrons...how exactly? If one has a higher voltage, wouldn't it give more charges and thus electrons? Further, I tried to look at this mathematically:
deltaG* = -nfE* and
deltaG = deltaG* + RTlnK.
Then at equilibrium,
0 = -nFE* + RTlnK so
nfE* = RTlnK

Well certainly if E* is larger, then K would be larger meaning more products are favored at equilibrium and in turn more electrons, no?

Thanks for any help, much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the standard cell potential is more the tendency of an element to form its hydrated ion in a standard half cell.

the standard half cell would consist of the element in contact with a solution of its own hydrated ion. in a standard cell, the aqueous solutions are 1 molar, the gases are at 1 atm pressure and the temperature is 25 degrees.

the more positive the potential value is, the higher the tendency of the element to form its hydrated ion in the half cell.

like in your first half cell equation, A ----> A2+ + 2e-no, if the potential is positive, the reaction is not necessarily spontaneous. the potential value gives no indication of the reaction rate(kinetic). it says only whether the reaction is energetically feasible or not.

if you have hydrogen gas reacting with Cu2+

H2 <------> 2H+ + 2e- E* = 0 V

Cu2+ + 2e- <-------> Cu E* = +0.34 V

overall:

H2 + Cu2+ --------> 2H+ + Cu

emf = +0.34 V

but the reaction does not occur at rtp!

i don't if this is correct but, for your question, you should the equillibria aspect.
if the electrode potential is higher, then the equillibrium should be more to the right, and hence produce more electrons.
 
nothing123 said:
does that mean the electrons and positive ions in the reaction actually generate a potential of 2 volts (at least relative to the reference potential)?

Yes, assuming all substances taking place in the reaction are in their standard state (ie they all have activities equal to 1), measured potential of the system afainst hydrogen electrode will be 2.

Apparently, they generate the same number of electrons...how exactly? If one has a higher voltage, wouldn't it give more charges and thus electrons?

Same charge, but different amount of energy. Larger K doesn't necesarilly mean higher charge trasnferred. I mean - it does mean higher charge, but charge difference between K=1010 and K=1020 is neglectable, in both cases reaction for all practical purposes simply goes to completion.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top