Electrode Sign: + or -? Understanding Cell Potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrode Sign
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of electrode signs (+ or -) in electrochemical cells, focusing on the concepts of charge, potential, and the behavior of electrodes in galvanic and electrolytic cells. Participants explore theoretical and conceptual aspects without reaching a consensus.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the signs (+ or -) of electrodes should indicate the cell's potential rather than the actual charge of the electrodes, suggesting that electrodes should remain electrically neutral.
  • Others propose that the positive electrode is positively charged due to the loss of electrons, which leaves a net positive charge on the electrode.
  • There is a discussion about the distinction between galvanic and electrolytic cells, with some participants noting that the roles of cathodes and anodes differ in these contexts.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the textbook's explanations, suggesting that they may not adequately convey the relationship between charge and potential.
  • Concerns are raised about the movement of electrons and how it relates to the charge of the electrodes, with some suggesting that charge should balance out in an ideal scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of electrode signs, with multiple competing views on whether the signs reflect charge or potential. There is disagreement on the implications of these interpretations for galvanic versus electrolytic cells.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the textbook's explanations and express uncertainty about the definitions and assumptions underlying the discussion of electrode behavior.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
Electrodes in cells usually have a sign of either + or -

My textbook talks about the + as because the electrode is positively charged and - when negatively charged. But is that correct? The electrodes are meant to be conductors and shouldn't be charged at any time. When they do, the ions leave them and migrate into the solution.

So the + or - should instead point to the cell with the higher (+) or lower potential (-) given by the table of redox reactions. Nothing to do with charges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The resistance of the cell is greater than zero so the charge just naturally piles up on the negative electrode.
 
How do you explain the positive electrode is mainly positively charged?
 
Strip away a few electrons and the remaining electrode has a net positive charge.
 
It's not actually the charge they are talking about in your textbook, it's the flow of electrons.
Are you talking about a galvanic or an electrolytic cell?
 
chemisttree said:
Strip away a few electrons and the remaining electrode has a net positive charge.

But the electrons are pepertually moving so when electrons are lost, new ones are added.
 
+Minkie+ said:
It's not actually the charge they are talking about in your textbook, it's the flow of electrons.
Are you talking about a galvanic or an electrolytic cell?

I think it doesn't matter which. They use their explanation for both. I know that from a physics textbook, the + and - ends of a battery are not described as + charge or - charge but higher and lower potential for + and - respectively.
 
It does matter.
In a galvanic cell the cathode is positive and the anode is negative.
In an electrolytic cell the cathode is negative and the anode is positive.

So we need to know whether your producing electricity from a cell, e.g. a battery.
Or putting electricity into a cell, e.g. electroplating.
 
I think my textbook would say that cathode is positive => cathode is positively charged. cathode is negative => cathode is negatively charged. However, I like to intepret positive as higher potential and negative as lower potential. In this light I agree that (as you stated)

In a galvanic cell the cathode is positive and the anode is negative.
In an electrolytic cell the cathode is negative and the anode is positive.

So I disagree witht the textbook in this fundalmental point of intepretation.
 
  • #10
Possibly referring to when electrons are lost negative charge is lost, hence the atom they were lost from gains a positive charge.
I don't know why this would apply to the electrodes though, only the ions.
 
  • #11
+Minkie+ said:
Possibly referring to when electrons are lost negative charge is lost, hence the atom they were lost from gains a positive charge.
I don't know why this would apply to the electrodes though, only the ions.

That's the thing, in my view, the electrods should merely be charge carriers and be electrically neutral. Charge gained=charge lost at all times for an ideal electrode.
 
  • #12
Ya well I can't think of anything else, so I think it may be the textbook.
They don't get proof read very well so it is quite likely.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K