Electromagnetic signals questions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of electromagnetic signals, specifically the relationship between cosine and exponential forms. Participants explore the conversion between these forms and the implications of using complex notation in physical measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the conversion between cosine and exponential forms of electromagnetic signals and questions the implications of omitting the imaginary part in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the use of complex notation and emphasize that the real part is what corresponds to physical measurements. There is an exploration of the role of the imaginary part in intermediate calculations, although no consensus on the necessity of including it is reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of using complex numbers in the context of electromagnetic signals and quantum mechanics, with a focus on how this relates to physical interpretations and measurements.

dervast
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
Hi i have noticed that some times we can denote an electromagnetic signal using cos os some timew we can write it in exponential form? Is that true? How can we convert from one type to the other?
For example i think that the signal Acos(wt-kr) it can be written to Ae^i(wt-kr)

Thx a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually, the physical result from complex notion is to take the real part,
so what you have written is correct. Keep the complex notation until you want to write down the predicted physical measuement.
The relation is [itex]e^{ix}=\cos x +i\sin x[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
so when i write Acos(wt-kr) i forget to write the imaginary part right? Dont we lose information in that way? What the real part means (is used for) and what the imaginary one..
Thx a lot
 
The I am part is useful for intermediate calculations, but a final physical answer is always just the real part. For Quantum, the physical answer is always bilinear, like \psi^* \psi, which is real.
 
Thx a lot and what intermediate calculations are?
 
dervast said:
Thx a lot and what intermediate calculations are?
I just mean the steps between the beginning and the final answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K