Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Electromagnetism: Can anyone find the mistake?

  1. Jan 22, 2006 #1
    given: the electric field at a point on the axis a distance x from the plane of a ring is [tex]E = \frac {q*x} {4*pi*E0*(x^2+r^2)^{3/2}}[/tex]

    where E0
    is the permeability coefficient

    The charged ring is replaced by a circular sheet of charge of radius a a surface charge density sigma. The ring can be divided into infinitessimally small rings of radius r and thicknes dr. Show that the electric field is given by [tex] E= \frac {sigma} {2*E0} * [1 - \frac {x} {(x^2 + a^2)^{1/2}}][/tex]

    this is what I did:

    charge on each ring:

    [tex] 2*pi*r*sigma*dr = A*sigma=Q [/tex]

    Electric field on each ring:

    [tex] E = \frac {2*pi*sigma*dr*x*r} {4*pi*E0*(x^2 + r^2)^{3/2}} = \frac {sigma*dr*x*r} {2*E0*(x^2 + r^2)^{3/2}} [/tex]

    Integrate over ring:

    [tex] \frac {sigma} {2*E0} * \int_{0}^{a} \frac {r} {(x^2 + r^2)^{3/2}} dx = \frac {sigma} {2*E0} * [-1/2*\frac{1} {(x^2+a^2)^{0.5}}] (from 0 to a) = \frac {sigma} {4*E0}* [1 - \frac {x} {(x^2+a^2)^{.5}}] [/tex]

    why is that factor 4 here (it's supposed to be 2)? Help's very much appreciated!
    LaTeX
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 22, 2006 #2

    siddharth

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Looks like you missed a 'r' in the numerator in when you calculated Electric field on each ring:
     
  4. Jan 22, 2006 #3
    Yes, sorry...missed to write that one in one line. However, I had it back in the integration the line below, so that it didn't affect the answer. It's now edited.

    Does anyone have any idea about that factor 4?
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2006
  5. Jan 22, 2006 #4

    siddharth

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The factor is supposed to be '2'. The derivative of [itex] r^2 [/itex] is [itex] 2r [/itex]. So if you take that into account, you will not get '4'.
     
  6. Jan 22, 2006 #5
    That's exactly what I did and that caused all the trouble:

    substitute: u= x^2 + a^2

    so then you have to multiply by (1/2)...oh yeah....I see! I didn't multiply by two when I did the integration......:yuck:

    Oh dear! :cry:

    Anyways - thank you so much!!!
    :cool:
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook