1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Electromagnetism of particle problem

  1. Aug 6, 2010 #1


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    We are given surface current density, K which is constant (K is negative) along the z-axis which is placed in x=a plane (the board which contains this density is neutral), in x=0 plane there's an infinite plane which is charged by a surface density [tex] \sigma[/tex] which is constant.
    we have a particle with charge q and mass m which starts at rest at r=0.
    1. given sigma find out what is the minimal K s.t the particles doesn't cross the boards.
    2. given the K you found assume now K is twice the K in 1, and show that:
    the minimal distance from the board with the current is
    [tex]d_{min} = a- \frac{m\sigma}{\pi q (3\sigma^2 +\frac{4m\sigma}{\pi q a})}[/tex]

    2. Relevant equations
    There's a file with a picture of the system attached to this post here:
    It's question number 1, you shouldn't mind that the text is in hebrew, I translated what it asks in English.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    For 1 I thought of looking at the force euqation:

    mv^2/a = qE+ qv x B where E is the electric field from the charged board and B is from the above board (situated at x=a), and then just need to find out when there's only one solution to this quadratic equation with regards to v, the veclotiy of the particle.

    The problem arises when I need to prove (2).
    Don't know how to do it.

    Last edited: Aug 6, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 7, 2010 #2
    Re: electromagnetism.

    I guess things look like my picture? (see the picture attached) If so, then let me show you a way to obtain the general solution.

    It's easily shown that: [tex]\vec{B}=\frac{\mu _o|K|}{2}\hat{y}[/tex] and [tex]\vec{E}=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon _o}\hat{x}[/tex].

    The Newton's 2nd law equation for the particle: [tex]m\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}=e\vec{E}+q\vec{v}\times\vec{B}[/tex]


    (1): [tex]\frac{dv_x}{dt}=A+Bv_z[/tex]

    (2): [tex]\frac{dv_z}{dt}=-Bv_x[/tex]

    [tex]v_y=0[/tex] (the particle only moves inside the y=0 plane)

    where: [tex]A=e\frac{\sigma}{2m\epsilon _o}[/tex] and [tex]B=\frac{\mu _o|K|}{2m}q[/tex]

    From (1) and (2), you can solve for a relation between vx and vz. Remember the initial condition: [tex]\vec{v}(\vec{r}=0)=0[/tex]. From (2), you can solve for the relation between x and vz. Then from the 2 relations, you should get an equation relating vx and x. Notice that when the particle reaches to the closest distance to the board with current, vx=0.

    For part 1, we have xmax=a when vx=0. Solve for K (or |K|). For part 2, we simply substitute K with 2 times value of K from part 1.

    By the way, I don't see [tex]\epsilon _o[/tex] and [tex]\mu _o[/tex] anywhere in dmin needed to show. Maybe the question assumes using another unit system rather than SI system?

    P.S: By "mv^2/a = qE+ qv x B", you assumed that at the time the particle reaches x=a, the particle's radius of curvature at that point is a, which hasn't been shown. It can be 2a, 3a, or 1000a; we don't know. You have to show it.

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 7, 2010
  4. Aug 7, 2010 #3


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Re: electromagnetism.

    We're using cgs system of units and c=1.
    Thanks I think I understand what to do in 1.

    as of 2, I am not sure I understand what to do (I get in cgs units and c=1), that for part 1:

    K=m/(2qa), after solving the differential equation:

    [tex]d^2v_x/dt^2 = -(\frac{2\pi K q}{m})^2 v_x[/tex]
    which with v(0)=0 we get a sine function, and for x=a vx=0 we get what I wrote in the above.

    I think that in part 2, I need to write down xmax=d (where d is the distance from the lower plane situated at x=0), and then again vx=0, but I don't get the correct final solution.
  5. Aug 7, 2010 #4
    Re: electromagnetism.

    I've never worked with the CGS system before. Maybe that's how the term "pi" arises.
    You don't need to solve that differential equation. Just divide (1) by (2), you will get:
    Then do the integration: [tex]-\frac{B}{2}v_x^2=Av_z+\frac{B}{2}v_z^2[/tex]
    Integrate (2): [tex]v_z=-Bx[/tex]
    From the 2 equations above: [tex]-\frac{B}{2}v_x^2=-ABx+\frac{B^3}{2}x^2[/tex]
    I don't get the answer either. However, I think it's wrong. Consider the extreme case where [tex]\sigma = 0[/tex]. That means there is no electric field, no initial force to cause the particle to move, and the particle remains at rest at r=0. In that case, dmin=a. But from the answer:
    [tex]d_{min}=a-\frac{m\sigma}{3\pi q\sigma ^2+4m\sigma /a}=a-\frac{m}{3\pi q\sigma +4m/a}[/tex]
    when [tex]\sigma = 0[/tex] , we get [tex]d_{min}=3a/4[/tex] which is wrong.
  6. Aug 7, 2010 #5


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Re: electromagnetism.

    Ok I understnad what you write, Now when I solve the equation I get K~sqrt(sigma), so indeed if sigma equals zero then also K=0 zero cause otherwise the particle will cross the board situated at x=a.

    Again thanks for your help with this question.
  7. Aug 7, 2010 #6
    Re: electromagnetism.

    Logically this is not the reason. We haven't had anything to verify our solution yet, since the only hint (the answer) is different from ours. I only pointed out that the statement dmin =... in the question is logically wrong based on another reasoning, not on our result K~sqrt(sigma).
  8. Aug 7, 2010 #7


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Re: electromagnetism.

    But it doesn't make sense, even if there isn't an electric field, the particle would feel the force from the B-field, unless there is no also a magnetic field.
  9. Aug 7, 2010 #8
    Re: electromagnetism.

    Initially v=0, so if there is no electric field, even if there is B-field, the particle won't move at all.
  10. Aug 7, 2010 #9


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Re: electromagnetism.

    I see your point, thanks for clearing this out.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook