Electromarnetisem/ Magnetohydronamics

  • Thread starter Thread starter leoflindall
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 1K views
leoflindall
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider plane-parrallel, non magnetic single fluid flow in the z direction. Assume that the realtionship between pressure, velocity and density is constrained by equation (3), shown below.

Show that

[tex]\frac{P_{1}}{\rho_{1}}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{5P_{0}}{3\rho_{0}}[/tex]

Where

P[tex]_{0}[/tex] and [tex]\rho_{0}[/tex]

are the pressure and density of the uniform background on which a wave with small pressure and density fluctiations of

P[tex]_{1}[/tex] and [tex]\rho_{1}[/tex] propagates in the z direction.

Homework Equations




(1) [tex]\frac{d\rho}{dt}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{d}{dz}[/tex] ([tex]\rho[/tex] v) = 0

(Mass Conversation)

(2) v = vz^

(3) [tex]\frac{d}{dt}[/tex] [ [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] [tex]\rho[/tex]v[tex]^{2}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex]P ] + [tex]\frac{d}{dz}[/tex] [v([tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] [tex]\rho[/tex] v[tex]^{2}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex] P )] = 0

(The Constraining equation)
Please note where the notation [tex]\frac{d}{dt/dz}[/tex] has been used to indicate the partial differential (I'm not the best at Latex!)


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not looking for an answer to this problem. This a set problem that I have been set, and am at a loss at how to tackle it. I can the see there is a realtionship between the conservation of mass equation and the constraining equation, however I can't see how to tackle it to show what is required.

Any thoughts of hints inthe right direction would be greatly appreciated.

Many Thanks

Leo
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Solved.

Thank you for viewing.