Electron accelerated through a PD

  • Thread starter Thread starter hockeyhoser23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Pd
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An electron accelerated through a potential difference of 2 x 106 V requires a relativistic approach to calculate its velocity and energy. The kinetic energy (KE) can be determined using the formula KE = voltage × charge, where the charge of an electron is 1.6 x 10-19 C. For velocity calculations, the relativistic kinetic energy formula must be applied, specifically incorporating the Lorentz factor (γ), defined as γ = 1 / √(1 - v2/c2). This ensures that calculations remain valid without exceeding the speed of light (c).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics concepts
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy equations
  • Knowledge of the Lorentz factor (γ)
  • Basic principles of electric potential and charge
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relativistic kinetic energy formula in detail
  • Learn how to derive the Lorentz factor (γ) and its applications
  • Explore the implications of relativistic speeds on particle physics
  • Review the relationship between electric potential and particle acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particle physicists, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of electrons under relativistic conditions.

hockeyhoser23
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
An electron is accelerated from rest through a potential difference of 2 X 10^6 V. I need the velocity of the electron in order to calculate the energy of the particle. Using 1/2mv^2=u doesn't work because you get v > c. I can't seem to find an eqn to make the relativistic correction. Could someone help me find the velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi hockeyhoser23! :smile:

I need the velocity of the electron in order to calculate the energy of the particle. Using 1/2mv^2=u doesn't work because you get v > c. I can't seem to find an eqn to make the relativistic correction.[/QUOTE]

Use energy = m/√(1 - v2/c2) :smile:
 
just mass over the gamma factor?
 
oops! I missed out a c2. :redface:

Yes, just mc2/gamma … when v is small, that's approximately mc2 + (1/2)mv2 :wink:
 
hockeyhoser23 said:
just mass over the gamma factor?

He means \gamma mc^2

EDIT: tinytim beat me to it:smile:
 
Last edited:
tiny-tim said:
oops! I missed out a c2. :redface:

Yes, just mc2/gamma …

Errr... you mean "mc2 times[/color] gamma" right?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Errr... you mean "mc2 times[/color] gamma" right?

no idea … never use it … was just copying hockeyhoser23 :smile:
 
^ yeah sorry, gamma = 1 / (1-v^2/c^2)^1/2, so it would be gamma*mc^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K