Electron launched at an angle in a parallel plate field.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculations for an electron launched at an angle in a parallel plate electric field. The user correctly calculated the time of flight and acceleration but struggled with the application of the kinematic equation for vertical motion, specifically misapplying the formula by omitting the 1/2 factor. Participants emphasized the importance of verifying values for charge-to-mass ratio and ensuring all algebra is performed before inputting numerical values. Ultimately, the user acknowledged the mistake in the equation and corrected it, leading to a resolution of the problem. Accurate calculations and attention to detail are crucial in physics problems involving electric fields and motion.
Esoremada
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://puu.sh/6i6HY.png

Homework Equations



Fe = q*Ee

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
dx = vx*t
0.0682 = 4.92*106 * cos(68) * t
t = 0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]
= 3.70036*10-8 seconds

dy = dyi + vy*t + at2
0 = 0 + 4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) + a * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2
a = -4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) / [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2
= -1.23278 * 1014 m/s2

mass of electron = 9.10938291 * 10-31 kg
charge of electron = 1.60217657 * 10-19 C

Fe = ma
= 9.10938291 * 10-31 * [ -4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) / [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2 ]

Ee * q = Fe
Ee * 1.60217657 * 10-19 = 9.10938291 * 10-31 * [ -4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) / [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2 ]
Ee = 9.10938291 * 10-31 * [ -4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) / [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2 ] / (1.60217657 * 10-19)I got part b correct, so I must have the correct acceleration - now I can't figure out where I'm going wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your reasoning ...
Also: Remember your ballistics?

If you have the acceleration right, then E=a(m/q)
If that gives the wrong E then (a) you have used a bad value for q/m for an electron - maybe a rounding error? or (b) you didn;t get the right acceleration and the correctness of the answer to part b is a fluke.

Best practice is to do all the algebra before putting the numbers in.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Esoremada said:

Homework Statement



http://puu.sh/6i6HY.png

Homework Equations



Fe = q*Ee

The Attempt at a Solution



a)

d = vt
0.0682 = 4.92*10^6 * cos(68) * t
t = 0.0682 / [4.92*10^6 * cos(68)]
= 3.70036*10^-8

The time of flight is correct if you meant in in seconds.

Esoremada said:
d = di + vt + at^2
0 = 0 + 4.92*10^6 * 3.70036*10^-8 * sin(68) + a * [3.70036*10^-8]^2
a = -4.92*10^6 * 3.70036*10^-8 * sin(68) / [3.70036*10^-8]^2
= -1.23278 * 10^14 m/s^2


Is it the same d as before, when you wrote that d=vt?


The electric field is normal to the capacitor plates. What is the direction of the acceleration? Does the electron accelerate horizontally?

ehild
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
ehild said:
Is it the same d as before, when you wrote that d=vt?


The electric field is normal to the capacitor plates. What is the direction of the acceleration? Does the electron accelerate horizontally?

ehild

No I used horizontal velocity and distance to find time, and then used vertical velocity, distance and time to find acceleration. I'll add subscripts to the OP to make that more clear

Simon Bridge said:
Check your reasoning ...
Also: Remember your ballistics?

If you have the acceleration right, then E=a(m/q)
If that gives the wrong E then (a) you have used a bad value for q/m for an electron - maybe a rounding error? or (b) you didn;t get the right acceleration and the correctness of the answer to part b is a fluke.

Best practice is to do all the algebra before putting the numbers in.

I took the electron values to many more decimals than the homework system checks (3).

I changed all my calculations to not use any previously calculated values and reformatted the exponents. Do you see any specific incorrect logic or calculation now?
 
The equation

dy = dyi + vy*t + at2

is wrong. Check.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
ehild said:
The equation

dy = dyi + vy*t + at2

is wrong. Check.

ehild

Oh man, messed up that equation after using it hundreds of times. Thank you very much, that fixed it.

(and I forget the 1/2 both times and the mistakes canceled out which is why I got the right answer for part b :rolleyes:)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top