Electron-positron pair production

Stanley514
Messages
404
Reaction score
2
Is it true that static electric field 10^16 V/cm2 is capable to create positron-electron pairs? Is this process associated with energy release? If yes, where energy comes from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can get pair production from a static electric field.
The process is not associated with any additional energy release.

i.e.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.4120
 
How can one produce a Sauter electric field/potential? The potential looks like a step-function one.
 
Simon Bridge said:
You can get pair production from a static electric field.
The process is not associated with any additional energy release.

i.e.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.4120
But if you need no energy to maintain electrostatic field, in principle, and this field creates positrons and electrons from ''nothingless'' and these positrons have real energy and could annihilate with something releasing gamma rays, wouldn't it mean we received energy from physical vacuum?
 
Stanley514 said:
But if you need no energy to maintain electrostatic field
For fields so strong that you get pair production you do need energy to maintain them. Otherwise the produced charges will weaken it over time (as electrons go to the positive side and positrons go to the negative side).
It is just a conversion of energy - from strong electric fields to particle masses and weaker fields.
 
this field creates positrons and electrons from ''nothingness"
... the field does not make positrons and electrons out of "nothingness" nor out of "physical vacuum". As you point out, if it did, then energy would not be conserved.

The energy to make the particle/anti-particle pair comes from the electric field.
Please see: http://ryuc.info/creativityphysics/energy/pair_production.htm
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top