Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Pair Production in Empty Space

  1. Jan 11, 2019 at 10:56 AM #1
    I am not sure this question has been asked here before but I am curious about it. From the Modern Physics Course, I learned that we need a nucleus to create an electron and positron pair (with a photon). And the reason is stated as to conserve linear momentum. If this is the case then how the electrons or quarks created in the early universe?

    Is it because in the near-nucleus case we have 1 photon that is creating 2-pairs and in the early universe we can have 2 photons so that there's no need a nucleus or there's something else?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 11, 2019 at 11:21 AM #2

    Orodruin

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2018 Award

    Truth with modification. The reason is conservation of squared total 4-momentum, i.e., com energy.

    This has nothing to do with pair production. If it did there would be equal amounts of quarks and antiquarks, etc. Instead, you need to create a baryon asymmetry. We dont know how that happened, but there are some theories.

    In the early universe, photons and fermions were at thermal equilibrium. Mainly due to 2-to-2 scatters. There was almost as much antimatter as matter. As the universe cooled down, the symmetric component annihilated away, leaving just the asymmetric component as surplus matter.
     
  4. Jan 11, 2019 at 3:54 PM #3

    mfb

    Staff: Mentor

    That is a possible process, but there were also other particles around. It doesn't have to be a nucleus, a quark in a quark gluon plasma does the job as well, for example.

    Pair production from two photons has been observed in colliders, by the way.
     
  5. Jan 11, 2019 at 4:41 PM #4

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Pair production in the early universe was essentially photon-photon interaction. (Note mfb comment).
     
  6. Jan 11, 2019 at 11:55 PM #5
    I see now, thanks all
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?