Electrostatics, Energy of a uniformly charged sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the energy stored in a uniformly charged solid sphere of radius R and charge q using three different equations from Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics." The participant initially derived an energy value of W = (9/20)(kq²/R) using Eq. 2.43, while obtaining W = (3/5)(kq²/R) for Eqs. 2.45 and 2.44. The discrepancy was resolved by correcting a factor of 1/2 in the potential V for r < R, leading to consistent results across all equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and electric potential
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" equations
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in physics
  • Basic concepts of charge distribution and electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Griffiths' Eq. 2.43 for energy calculations in electrostatics
  • Study the derivation and application of Eq. 2.45 for energy density
  • Explore the implications of charge distribution on electric potential
  • Practice solving problems involving uniformly charged spheres
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics and energy calculations in electric fields, will benefit from this discussion.

NeoDevin
Messages
334
Reaction score
2
From Griffiths, Third edition Intro Electrodynamics

I've been working on this problem, and I get 2 different answers. I get the same answer for parts b and c, but not for a. I know I'm probably just doing something silly along the way, but I can't find my mistake...

Homework Statement


Find the energy stored in a uniformly charged solid sphere of radius R and charge q. Do it three different ways:
(a) Use Eq. 2.43
(b) Use Eq. 2.45
(c) Use Eq. 2.44

Homework Equations


Eq. 2.43 W=\frac{1}{2}\int \rho V d\tau
Eq. 2.45 W=\frac{\epsilon_{0}}{2}\int_{all space} E^2 d\tau
Eq. 2.44 W=\frac{\epsilon_{0}}{2}\left(\int_{V} E^2 d\tau + \oint_{S} VE\cdot da\right)

The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a) we have:
E(r)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}\frac{kq}{r^2}, &amp;\mbox{ if } r &gt; R\\ \frac{kq}{R^3} r, &amp;\mbox{ if } r &lt; R \end{array}\right<br /> \\ \Rightarrow V(r) = \left\{\begin{array}{cc}\frac{kq}{r}, &amp; r &gt; R\\ \frac{3kq}{2R} - \frac{kq}{R^3} r^2, &amp; r &lt; R \end{array}\right

Since it's uniformly charged, we know that:
\rho = \frac{3q}{4\pi R^3} \\

Then we can evaluate Eq. 2.43 to get:
W=2\pi\rho\int_{0}^R V(r) r^2 dr \\<br /> = \frac{9}{20} \frac{kq^2}{R}

For (b) and (c) however I get:

W=\frac{3}{5} \frac{kq^2}{R}

So they are off by a factor of 3/4.

If you need to see more work to help me find my mistake, let me know and I will post more details.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
E is the NEGATIVE gradient of the potential. You have a sign error. Also as written V is not even continuous across r=R, but I assume that is just a typo.
 
Thanks, there's no sign errors, but I forgot a factor of 1/2 in the second term of V for r<R
 
NeoDevin said:
Thanks, there's no sign errors, but I forgot a factor of 1/2 in the second term of V for r<R

I guess you're right. The sign error was mine!
 
Yeah, I worked it out with the correct expression for V, and it gives me the same answer now, thanks.
 
NeoDevin, you wouldn't happen to be in professor schick's class would you?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
757
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K