What Are Elliptic Curves and Their Connection to Fermat's Last Theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Char. Limit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on elliptic curves and their connection to Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT). The Taniyama-Shimura conjecture, now known as the Modularity Theorem, asserts that every rational elliptic curve can be expressed as a modular form. Participants clarify that FLT states there are no integer solutions for the equation a^n + b^n = c^n when n > 2, and they emphasize the importance of understanding modularity and elliptic curves for a complete grasp of FLT. For further reading, the recommended resource is the book "A First Course in Modular Forms" by Diamond and Shurman.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermat's Last Theorem and its implications
  • Familiarity with elliptic curves, specifically the equation y^2 = x^3
  • Knowledge of modular forms and the Modularity Theorem
  • Basic mathematical education, ideally at least AP Calculus BC level
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the Wikipedia articles on Fermat's Last Theorem and elliptic curves
  • Study the Modularity Theorem and its implications in number theory
  • Explore the book "A First Course in Modular Forms" by Diamond and Shurman
  • Investigate the relationship between elliptic curves and modular forms in greater detail
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematics students, particularly those studying number theory, as well as educators and enthusiasts seeking to deepen their understanding of elliptic curves and their significance in proving Fermat's Last Theorem.

Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23
What are they? And what does it mean to say that all elliptic curves are modular?

Trying to understand Fermat's Last Theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Char. Limit said:
What are they? And what does it mean to say that all elliptic curves are modular?

Trying to understand Fermat's Last Theorem.

It should be "every rational elliptic curve is a modular form in disguise" by taniyama-shimura conjecture or modularity theorem. What do you know about Fermat's last theorem?
 
I know that it proves that for n>2, there is no integer solution to the equation a^n+b^n=c^n. I know that Fermat proved this for n^4 by using "infinite descent". I know that because of this, his theorem is true for all positive composite numbers. Also, I believe that it would be true for all negative numbers as well, that is, the n>2 could be replaced with |n|>2.

Finally, I know that the complete solution involves something about modularity and elliptic curves... which I think have the equation y^2=x^3 or something like that.

That's about it.
 
I think that if you want us to answer your questions, we need to know what is your mathematical education level...you can also try to read meanwhile Wikipedia
 
Char. Limit said:
I know that it proves that for n>2, there is no integer solution to the equation a^n+b^n=c^n. I know that Fermat proved this for n^4 by using "infinite descent". I know that because of this, his theorem is true for all positive composite numbers. Also, I believe that it would be true for all negative numbers as well, that is, the n>2 could be replaced with |n|>2.

Finally, I know that the complete solution involves something about modularity and elliptic curves... which I think have the equation y^2=x^3 or something like that.

That's about it.

The underlined sentence is false. Fermat's proof of the case n = 4 implies that it suffices to consider odd prime exponents, but not what you typed.
 
TheForumLord said:
I think that if you want us to answer your questions, we need to know what is your mathematical education level...you can also try to read meanwhile Wikipedia

Currently taking AP Calculus BC in high school... also, if something is given to me in understandable terms, i can usually understand it. Usually.

Petek said:
The underlined sentence is false. Fermat's proof of the case n = 4 implies that it suffices to consider odd prime exponents, but not what you typed.
So... does the proof at n=4 prove the theorem for all even numbers greater than 4, maybe?
 
Char. Limit said:
Currently taking AP Calculus BC in high school... also, if something is given to me in understandable terms, i can usually understand it. Usually.


So... does the proof at n=4 prove the theorem for all even numbers greater than 4, maybe?

Sorry, that doesn't follow either.

Petek
 
But, if it reduces the possible counterexamples to odd prime exponents, it would seem to rule out *even* numbers greater than 4.
 
I thought that you were claiming that the proof of FLT for n = 4 implied that it held for all even exponents. That's not true. For example, let n = 6. The conclusion that x^6 + y^6 = z^6 has no solutions in integers would follow from the result for n = 3 (because a solution for n = 6 would imply a solution for n = 3 -- (x^2)^3 + (y^2)^3 = (z^2)^3). The fact that there's no solution for n = 4 doesn't help in this case. See the Wikipedia article on FLT for more details. Hope this is clear. If not, please post again.

Petek
 
  • #10
It's clear. However, my original question was never answered: what are elliptic curves, what is modularity, and why are all elliptic curves modular?
 
  • #11
Char. Limit said:
It's clear. However, my original question was never answered: what are elliptic curves, what is modularity, and why are all elliptic curves modular?

These questions don't have easy answers. The mathematics of FLT lie at the graduate level, if not higher. As suggested earlier in the thread, look at the Wikipedia articles on FLT and elliptic curves. The best elementary introduction to elliptic curves probably is https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387978259/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by Diamond and Shurman. This text covers modularity and such, but isn't an easy read.

HTH

Petek
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K