Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the possibility of embedding a constant slice of a Weyl metric in three-dimensional Euclidean space, specifically focusing on a metric dependent on both ##\rho## and ##z##. Participants explore the challenges associated with embedding a specific line element derived from a two black holed Majumdar-Papapetrou metric.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions the feasibility of embedding the ##\phi##=constant slice of a Weyl metric in ##R^3##, noting the dependence on ##\rho## and ##z##.
- Another participant suggests that the original question may be too general and requires further specification to be answerable.
- A participant proposes embedding the line element ##ds^2=U^2(dx^2+dy^2)##, where ##U=1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{(x-1)^2+y^2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{(x+1)^2+y^2}}##, into 3D Euclidean space, highlighting the challenge of the indefinite integral.
- Concerns are raised regarding the undefined nature of the function ##U## at specific points, which are identified as degenerate horizons of black holes.
- A later reply indicates that the embedding function may involve an indefinite integral likely expressed in terms of elliptic integrals, suggesting a potential shift in the discussion's focus to pure mathematics.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
The discussion reflects a lack of consensus, with multiple competing views on the feasibility and approach to embedding the Weyl metric and the specific line element. Participants express uncertainty regarding the integration process and the implications of undefined points in the metric.
Contextual Notes
Participants note limitations related to the generality of the original question, the undefined nature of the function ##U## at certain points, and the potential complexity of the resulting integrals, which may not have straightforward solutions.