New Superconducting RF Cavity: Potential for EMdrive Propulsion?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the skepticism surrounding the potential use of superconducting radio-frequency cavities for EMdrive propulsion. Participants emphasize that the concept is rooted in pseudoscience, with no credible scientific literature supporting its validity. Notable references include critiques from Blake Stacey and John Baez, who highlight the lack of empirical evidence and caution against the investment in such theories, particularly by the Chinese space program.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of superconducting radio-frequency technology
  • Familiarity with the principles of propulsion systems
  • Knowledge of scientific methodology and peer review processes
  • Awareness of the EMdrive concept and its controversies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of superconducting radio-frequency cavities
  • Study the scientific critiques of the EMdrive, focusing on articles by Blake Stacey and John Baez
  • Explore the history of pseudoscience in aerospace research
  • Investigate the current state of funding and research in propulsion technologies by national space agencies
USEFUL FOR

Scientists, aerospace engineers, and skeptics interested in the intersection of advanced propulsion technologies and scientific integrity will benefit from this discussion.

sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
Physics news on Phys.org
IBTL!

In a nutshell, this is pseudoscience, and we don't discuss nonsense like that here.

A couple of links:

Blake Stacey, Science After Sunclipse, The EmDrive Story, or How to Propel Pseudoscience, http://scienceblogs.com/sunclipse/2008/09/the_emdrive_story_or_how_to_pr.php

John Baez, The b-Category Cafe, New Scientist Reacts, http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2006/10/new_scientist_reacts.htmlWhat about articles in the scientific literature debunking this? Sorry, there are none. There are no articles in the scientific literature that describe this nonsense, either. It is poppycock. You won't find articles in the scientific literature debunking this because there is no reason to publish such a paper. That New Scientist did is troubling.

That the Chinese have been snookered into investing in it is even more troubling. Then again, they are spending a lot of money to become a spacefaring nation. When NASA was rolling in the dough back in the 1960s they wasted a bit of money on pure nonsense. Apparently the Chinese have been caught in the same trap.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K