Undergrad End point information in lagrangain variation principle

Click For Summary
In Lagrangian variation, the goal is to minimize the action defined by the integral of the Lagrangian over time. When considering a free particle, if one only knows the initial position, the motion can be determined using the Euler-Lagrange equation. However, when applying the variation principle, both the initial and final positions must be fixed to accurately determine the true path through action minimization. This requirement stems from the need to eliminate boundary terms and ensure that the path variations respect the fixed endpoints. Understanding this principle clarifies the relationship between initial conditions and boundary conditions in deriving the equations of motion.
Ron19932017
Messages
32
Reaction score
3
In lagrangian variation we are trying to minimize the action
S = ∫t2t1 L dt.

Consider a simple case of free particle.

Imagine In a world that everyone one only knows how to solve ODE, Using euler lagrange equation, one has
d2x/dt2 = 0 , give that we know the initial position of particle in the phase space,
the people can solve for the motion.

Now imagine in a world that everyone only know variation principle. (They have some ways to measure action in every possible path and thus find out the least action one). They need to vary the path while KEEPING BOTH INITIAL point and end point fixed in the phase space. Then they can vary the path and find out the true one.

My question is, why in the first kind of world people only need to know about initial position in phase space but in the second kind of world people must know about the ending position in the phase space too ?

This "inconsistency of information" bothers me a lot. I appreciate anyone's help in explain or pointing out my misconception. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ron19932017 said:
They need to vary the path while KEEPING BOTH INITIAL point and end point fixed in the phase space
I think you have a misconception here: this least action theorem is only used to find conditions for the actual path. These conditions lead to the same ODE , which can then be solved to find the path when given a single set of conditions -- be it initial, boundary or whatever.
 
BvU said:
I think you have a misconception here: this least action theorem is only used to find conditions for the actual path. These conditions lead to the same ODE , which can then be solved to find the path when given a single set of conditions -- be it initial, boundary or whatever.
thanks for your reply. Howvere I still don't understand why we require the end points variation to be fixed.
Is there any physical reason behind to do it?
Or we just want to get rid of the boundary terms?
 
Forgot to welcome you ! Hello Ron, :welcome:

Don't know how to make this easier: principle of least action helps determine the actual path between two points in phase space. That alone sets the deviations at begin and end to zero.

Link to least action principle or to d'Alembert[/PLAIN] principle help ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
939
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K