Ending point for initial condition theories

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the convergence of various initial condition theories of the universe, specifically eternal inflation, LGC, cyclic, and bounce theories, at a completion time ATB where all theories yield an identical plasma. The proposed times for ATB are 10-12 seconds (1016 K), 10-10 seconds (1015 K), and 10-4 seconds (1012 K). The analysis concludes that 10-10 seconds is the most reasonable starting point, as it avoids issues with electroweak unification and accommodates the high density required by bounce and cyclic theories. Observational constraints, particularly big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), play a crucial role in evaluating these theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of initial condition theories in cosmology
  • Familiarity with electroweak unification and spontaneous symmetry breaking
  • Knowledge of big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) and its implications
  • Basic concepts of plasma physics and particle interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) on cosmological models
  • Study the electroweak force and its role in early universe conditions
  • Explore the details of cyclic and bounce theories in cosmology
  • Investigate observational constraints on early universe theories, particularly related to cosmic microwave background (CMB) patterns
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics enthusiasts interested in the early universe and the interplay of different cosmological theories will benefit from this discussion.

michaeljmj
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am not a scientist, but as a hobby I am summarizing different initial condition theories, specifically, eternal inflation, LGC, cyclic, and bounce theories. I need a completion time ATB where all theories produce an identical plasma. The plasma then enters the big bang process of expansion. I’m considering three possibilities for the starting time ATB: 10-12 sec (1016 K); 10-10 sec (1015 K); and, 10-4 sec (1012 K).

Selecting 10-12 sec (1016 K) implies that electroweak unification (spontaneous symmetry breaking) has not occurred - it is predicted at a later time (≈10-11 sec) and lower temperature (10-15.5 K). Thus, this time seems too early since all initial condition theories do not predict the electroweak force breaking into the weak and electromagnetic force, for example, the cyclic theory assumes four forces.

At 10-10 sec (1015 K), the issue of electroweak unification is avoided and only elementary particles (quarks, electrons, neutrinos) and bosons (force carriers: gluon, photon, and W) exist in the plasma. Also, the density is extremely high to accommodate the bounce and cyclic theories. Thus, a plasma at this time/temperature may be reasonable for all initial theories.

At 10-4 sec, quarks were forming neutrons and protons. The universe’s diameter was a macro value of approximately one thousand meters. Since quarks were not free and since the density may not have been adequate for the cyclic and bounce theories, this may be too much elapsed time.

Is my logic sound, are there other considerations? Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
Typically people producing theories of the early universe make use of observational constraints to limit their theories. So there's not really a specific time where all the theories converge: it depends upon how the various theories impact observables.

Perhaps the observation which is sensitive to physics at the earliest times that's used to constrain early-universe theories is big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), which lays down the abundance of light elements. Different theories about the early universe will have a different impact upon BBN, so that there are theories which don't change BBN at all, but may have an impact on observables that show up a bit later, such as the pattern of hot and cold spots on the CMB.
 
Thanks, that sounds logical. My sources show nucleosynthesis: at 100 seconds ATB; a temperature of 109 K; a diameter of observable universe about 1010 meters; and a combination of helium, deuterium, and lithium nuclei plus elementary particles. Not knowing the technical details of bounce and cyclic theories, I assumed smaller time scales based on inflation ending prior to 10-12 sec.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K