Energy conservation vs momentum conservation in SHM

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass attached to a spring executing simple harmonic motion (SHM) and the effect of placing an additional mass on it at the mean position. The original poster seeks to understand the relationship between the amplitudes before and after the smaller mass is added, specifically the ratio A1/A2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply both momentum and energy conservation principles to the problem, questioning why energy conservation leads to a different conclusion than momentum conservation. Some participants suggest reviewing the calculations for potential errors.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of energy conservation in the context of adding mass to a system in motion. One participant notes that energy is not conserved during the process, likening it to an inelastic collision, which has prompted further clarification and exploration of the underlying principles.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the assumptions regarding external forces and the nature of the interaction when the smaller mass is added, which may affect the conservation of energy in this scenario.

nikhilarora
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a mass M , attached to a horizontal spring executes SHM(simple harmonic motion) with amplitude A1 . when the mass M passes through its mean position then a smaller mass m is placed over it and both of them move together with amplitude A2 . the ratio A1/A2 is ...?


Homework Equations


taking angular frequency = ω

The Attempt at a Solution



first taking two mass and spring as the system, since there is no external force momentum remain conserved , applying (M)(ω1)(A1) = (M+m)(ω2)(A2) , i get correct answer but while applying energy conservation equations, i get an incorrect answer!
will energy not remain conserved in such process?

please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi nikhilarora,

You might have done something wrong. Show your work.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Hi nikhilarora,

You might have done something wrong. Show your work.

ehild

using k=spring constant
applying momentum conservation :

M*(ω1)*A1 = (m+M)*(ω2)*A2
=>M*(k/M)1/2*A1 = (m+M)*(k/m+M)1/2*A2

=> A1/A2 = (M+m/M)1/2

applying energy conservation :

1/2 * M*(ω1)2 * A12 = 1/2 * (m+M) * (ω2)2 * A22
=> M*(k/M)*A12 = (m+M)*(k/m+M)*A22
=> A12=A22
=> A1=A2

where have i done wrong ??
 
I see. The energy is not conserved when you put the small mass on the vibrating one. It is like an inelastic collision: the masses move together. So the bigger mass has to accelerate up the smaller one, and that happens with the assistance of friction or some other force which does work.

ehild
 
ehild said:
I see. The energy is not conserved when you put the small mass on the vibrating one. It is like an inelastic collision: the masses move together. So the bigger mass has to accelerate up the smaller one, and that happens with the assistance of friction or some other force which does work.

ehild

thanks a lot !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K