Should I Consider the Electric Field Outside a Uniformly Charged Sphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guyvsdcsniper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Sphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the electric field outside a uniformly charged sphere should be considered when calculating the total electrostatic energy stored within it. One participant initially solved the problem using only the electric field inside the sphere, questioning the relevance of the external field. However, it was clarified that the energy of a static charge distribution is derived from integrating the energy density over all space, which includes the electric field outside the sphere. This understanding led to a realization that the external electric field is indeed relevant to the calculation. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of considering the entire electromagnetic field when determining total energy.
guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
The goal of this problem is to find the total electrostatic energy stored in a uniformly charge
sphere of radius R and total charge Q. Note that the charge is uniformly distributed throughout the whole volume –this is not a shell.

Express your answer in terms of Q, R, and constants of nature. There are many different ways to do this, you might want to use two different methods so you can check your result.
Relevant Equations
W= ϵ /2 ∫ E²dt
I solved this problem on my own using the Energy formula. When I compared my answer to online answers (attached) as well as the griffiths solution manual, I noticed they also include the Electric field outside the sphere into their calculations. I did not and only use the Electric Field inside.

Am I wrong for just considering the Electric Field inside the sphere? The problem explicitly states "find the total electrostatic energy stored IN a uniformly charge sphere". I don't see how E outside is relevant to the question.
media_53a_53a1ce99-e699-4af3-ac5b-7ab9ffe09d62_phpaxYpAF.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy of a static charge distribution is an integral of the energy density ##(1/2) \epsilon_0 E^2## over all space, which reflects the idea that said energy is stored in the electromagnetic field (which extends over all space) rather than the charges themselves.
 
ergospherical said:
The energy of a static charge distribution is an integral of the energy density ##(1/2) \epsilon_0 E^2## over all space, which reflects the idea that said energy is stored in the electromagnetic field (which extends over all space) rather than the charges themselves.
Thank you that makes sense. I actually just got done re reading my book and forgot about the "all space" part of this equation. It makes sense now.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top