Energy of a system of point charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy calculations for a system of four point charges and the implications of these calculations on energy conservation. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the definitions of the quantities U and W, and how they relate to the work done in assembling the system of charges.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the work done to assemble the charges and the potential energy of the system. Questions arise about the interpretation of U and W, and whether energy conservation is maintained. There is also a discussion about the counting of potential energy contributions from pairs of charges versus individual charges.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the counting of potential energy and its implications for energy conservation. The conversation indicates a productive exploration of the concepts, though no consensus is reached on the overall understanding of the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a potential lack of clarity in the calculations presented in their lecture, which may be contributing to their confusion. There is also mention of a related issue involving an image charge and the discrepancies in calculated work, suggesting further exploration of assumptions in that context.

fayled
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
I'm a little confused about something that came up in a lecture a while back. There's nothing about it any books or online seemingly...

The energy for bringing four point charges from infinity to a their relative positions was calculated.

This was done by saying the work to bring in the first is zero, the work to bring in the second is the potential of the first times the charge of the second, the work to bring in the third is the sum of the potentials of the first and second times the charge of the third, and the work to bring in the fourth is the sum of the potentials of the first, second and third. Then the total work U=U1+U2+U3+U4.

Then the next calculation was such that for each charge, there was a sum over the product of the net potential due to the three other charges with that specific charge, and then the total energy of the system W was simply the sum of these products for each of the charges. With a bit of algebra, you could show W=2U.

Now, I'm very confused as to what is actually going on here. I'm a little confused about what the quantites U and W actually represent, and I'm a bit concerned about energy conservation because I feel it implies the work to form the system doesn't equal the potential energy. I realize this may be a bit vague without the actual calculations so if need be I can post some more. If anybody could explain that would be great, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy conservation is fine. In the second case, you count the potential energy twice - potential energy comes from pairs of charges, not from individual charges. If you add the potential energy for the pair (charge1, charge2) twice (once for charge1 and once for charge2), you get twice the real result.
 
mfb said:
Energy conservation is fine. In the second case, you count the potential energy twice - potential energy comes from pairs of charges, not from individual charges. If you add the potential energy for the pair (charge1, charge2) twice (once for charge1 and once for charge2), you get twice the real result.

Yeah that makes sense, but do you see any point in this exercise? It effectively proves 2=2x1...
 
It shows that you have to be careful, otherwise you could calculate 2 and think you had 1.
 
Another possibly related issue - if I have a charge near an infinite grounded conducting plate, then I can find the force acting on the charge using an image charge and the find the work done to move this to infinity by integrating the force with respect to distance. However if I try to calculate this work finding the potential due to the image charge at the charge of interest, and then multiply by the charge on the charge of interest, I receive a result which is too large by a factor of two.

I know the latter method is flawed but I don't understand why - surely if the image charge system is set up correctly I should be able to calculate all quantities above the sheet using it...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K