Energy of a system of point charges

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of energy in a system of four point charges and the confusion surrounding the definitions of total work (W) and potential energy (U). The energy to bring the charges from infinity to their positions is calculated using the potential contributions from each charge, leading to the conclusion that W equals 2U due to double counting of potential energy from charge pairs. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding energy conservation and the correct interpretation of potential energy in relation to charge interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and point charge interactions
  • Familiarity with the concept of electric potential and potential energy
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations related to energy calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of potential energy in systems of multiple point charges
  • Learn about the method of image charges and its applications in electrostatics
  • Explore the implications of energy conservation in electrostatic systems
  • Investigate common pitfalls in calculating work done in electrostatic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals in electrostatics, particularly those studying electric potential and energy interactions in systems of point charges.

fayled
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
I'm a little confused about something that came up in a lecture a while back. There's nothing about it any books or online seemingly...

The energy for bringing four point charges from infinity to a their relative positions was calculated.

This was done by saying the work to bring in the first is zero, the work to bring in the second is the potential of the first times the charge of the second, the work to bring in the third is the sum of the potentials of the first and second times the charge of the third, and the work to bring in the fourth is the sum of the potentials of the first, second and third. Then the total work U=U1+U2+U3+U4.

Then the next calculation was such that for each charge, there was a sum over the product of the net potential due to the three other charges with that specific charge, and then the total energy of the system W was simply the sum of these products for each of the charges. With a bit of algebra, you could show W=2U.

Now, I'm very confused as to what is actually going on here. I'm a little confused about what the quantites U and W actually represent, and I'm a bit concerned about energy conservation because I feel it implies the work to form the system doesn't equal the potential energy. I realize this may be a bit vague without the actual calculations so if need be I can post some more. If anybody could explain that would be great, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy conservation is fine. In the second case, you count the potential energy twice - potential energy comes from pairs of charges, not from individual charges. If you add the potential energy for the pair (charge1, charge2) twice (once for charge1 and once for charge2), you get twice the real result.
 
mfb said:
Energy conservation is fine. In the second case, you count the potential energy twice - potential energy comes from pairs of charges, not from individual charges. If you add the potential energy for the pair (charge1, charge2) twice (once for charge1 and once for charge2), you get twice the real result.

Yeah that makes sense, but do you see any point in this exercise? It effectively proves 2=2x1...
 
It shows that you have to be careful, otherwise you could calculate 2 and think you had 1.
 
Another possibly related issue - if I have a charge near an infinite grounded conducting plate, then I can find the force acting on the charge using an image charge and the find the work done to move this to infinity by integrating the force with respect to distance. However if I try to calculate this work finding the potential due to the image charge at the charge of interest, and then multiply by the charge on the charge of interest, I receive a result which is too large by a factor of two.

I know the latter method is flawed but I don't understand why - surely if the image charge system is set up correctly I should be able to calculate all quantities above the sheet using it...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K