I Energy of spinning objects as axis of rotation moves

AI Thread Summary
When an object like a throwing knife spins without a fixed axis, its axis of rotation naturally converges to its center of mass to minimize its moment of inertia (I). The energy of rotation remains constant if no resistive forces act on it, leading to an increase in angular velocity as I decreases. The relationship between energy, moment of inertia, and angular velocity is described by the equation E = (1/2) I ω², where both I and ω are time-dependent. The total kinetic energy of the object combines translational and rotational components, represented by T = (M/2) v² + (1/2) ω Θ ω, where M is mass and Θ is the inertia tensor. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing the motion of spinning objects in physics.
Trollfaz
Messages
143
Reaction score
14
Imagine an object, e.g throwing knife, spins in the air but not forced to rotate about a particular axis, i.e no rod impaling it and forcing it to spin about the rod. Then the axis of rotation converges to it's center of mass (CM) to minimize I. But there's nowhere for it's rotation energy to go assuming no resistive forces of the medium.
$$E=\frac{1}{2} I \omega^2= k$$
Both I and ##\omega## are functions of t and
##\frac{dI}{dt}<0##
So angular velocity increases?
$$\frac{dE}{dt}=\frac{dI}{dt}\omega^2+ 2I\omega\frac{d\omega}{dt}=0$$
$$\frac{d\omega}{dt}=-\frac{dI}{dt}\omega^2/2I\omega>0$$
And if we know the rate of change of I we can solve this differential equation to find how angular velocity evolves
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression for the energy only describes the rotational energy of the body around the given axis but not the translational energy of the body as a whole. It's most simple to choose the center of mass as the body-fixed reference point. Then the total kinetic energy of the rigid body reads
$$E_{\text{kin}}=T=\frac{M}{2} \dot{\vec{R}}^2 + \frac{1}{2} \vec{\omega} \hat{\Theta} \vec{\omega},$$
where ##M## is the total mass and ##\hat{\Theta}## is the tensor of inertia around the center of mass of the body.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top