Energy-Time Uncertainty of Gaussian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy-time uncertainty principle applied to a Gaussian wavefunction, specifically \(\Psi(x,0)=Ae^{-ax^2}e^{ilx}\). Participants are exploring the implications of this wavefunction in the context of quantum mechanics, particularly focusing on the calculations of expected values and uncertainties.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the time-dependent wavefunction and calculate the expected values \(\) and \(\) to apply the uncertainty principle. There are discussions about whether these expected values remain constant over time and the potential use of orthonormal eigenfunctions in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on manipulating the wavefunction and suggested methods for handling the calculations, while others are questioning the validity of certain assumptions and interpretations related to the energy eigenfunctions and their relation to the problem at hand. The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the complexity of the calculations involved, particularly in deriving the necessary integrals and derivatives, which may be influenced by the imposed homework constraints. Additionally, some participants express uncertainty about the physical intuition behind the problem, indicating a focus on mathematical manipulation rather than conceptual understanding.

sspitz
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Check the energy-time uncertainty principle for:
\Psi(x,0)=Ae^{-ax^2}e^{ilx}
using the observable x.

Homework Equations


<br /> \Delta{E}\Delta{t}\geq\hbar/2\\<br /> \Delta{E}=\sigma_H=\sqrt{&lt;H^2&gt;-&lt;H&gt;^2}\\<br /> \Delta{t}=\frac{\sigma_x}{\frac{d&lt;x&gt;}{dt}}<br />


The Attempt at a Solution


First I find the wavefunction with time dependence
<br /> \Psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int{\phi(k)e^{ikx-i\frac{\hbar k^{2}t}{2m}}dk}\\<br /> \phi(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int{\Psi(x,0)e^{-ikx}dx}<br />
This gives me a fairly complicated expression
<br /> \Psi(x,t)=\frac{Aexp(\frac{-ax^{2}+lix-\frac{tl^{2}i\hbar}{2m}}{w^{2}})}{w}\\<br /> A^{2}=\sqrt{\frac{2a}{\pi}},w^{2}=1+\frac{\hbar2ita}{m}<br />
Just finding <H> (not to mention <H^2> is giving me a lot of trouble. Is grinding out the derivatives and integrals the only way to do this problem?

The only other options I can think of:

1: <H> and <H^2> should not change in time (?), so I can just use the wavefunction at t=0 to find them? (But, still have to use the wavefunction with time to get the std dev of x)

2: Considering \frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} are like orthonormal eigenfunctions for H, could I say:

<br /> &lt;H&gt;=\int{\phi(k)^{2}E(k)dk}<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
remember that

\Psi (x, t) = e^{(-i/ \hbar) H t} \Psi (x, 0)

H commutes past the time evolution operator

x does not, use a series expansion to determine the correct commutation relation

Furthermore complete the square in the gaussian
 
You are definitely on the right track. Your expression is going to be ugly. Now, set
z\equiv 2 \hbar at/m
and use
\lvert \psi \lvert^2= \sqrt{ \frac{2a}{ \pi}} \frac{1}{ \sqrt{1+ z^2}} e^{-l^2/2a}e^{a\big\{ \frac{(ix+l/2a)^2}{(l+iz)}+ \frac{(-ix +l/2a)^2}{(1-iz)}\big\}}
Expand the term in the brackets {} of the right-hand exponent, and plug it back into
\lvert \psi(x,t) \lvert^2
where your psi should be
\psi(x,t)= \bigg( \frac{2a}{ \pi}\bigg)^{1/4} \frac{1}{ \sqrt{1+2i \hbar at/m}} e^{-l^2/4a}e^{a(ix+l/2a)^2/(1+2ia \hbar t/m)}
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help. I think I got it.

As a check on comprehension, I'd be interested in knowing if #2 in the original post is right or wrong and why. It seems to me that phi(k) above is for energy eigenfunctions what the momentum space wavefunction is for momentum eigenfunctions. That is, roughly, both show the amount of each eigenfunction in psi.
 
Code:
Sorry, I misunderstood your last question, so I'm editing my post. I'm going to have to come back to your #2 point later, since it's getting late where I am. The following was written when I misunderstood your question, so I'm just going to post it rather than waste it. If we're being honest, this problem is designed just to make you do some math. It doesn't really help you with any physical intuition. By convention, the time evolution operator is
\hat U (t,t_0) = e^{-i(t-t_0) \, \hat H/ \hbar}
or in application,
\big\lvert \, \psi(t) \big&gt;= e^{-i(t-t_0) \, \hat H/ \hbar} \big\lvert \, \psi(t_0) \big&gt;
So, for example, if you've got an infinite square well, at t_0 =0, in its ground state,
\big\lvert \, \psi_{n=1} (t=0) \big&gt;= \big\lvert \, \psi_1 (0) \big&gt;= \sqrt{ \frac{2}{a}} \sin\frac{ \pi x}{a}
You know the energy is
E_1= \frac{ \hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}
So at a future time t,
\big\lvert \, \psi_1 (t) \big&gt;= e^{-it \, \hat H/ \hbar} \bigg(\sqrt{ \frac{2}{a}} \sin\frac{ \pi x}{a}\bigg) = \bigg(\sqrt{ \frac{2}{a}} \sin\frac{ \pi x}{a}\bigg)e^{-it \, E_1/ \hbar} =\sqrt{ \frac{2}{a}} \sin\frac{ \pi x}{a}e^{-it \, \hbar \pi^2/2m a^2}
Time evolution is really pretty simple. It gets convoluted with Green's functions and stuff like that, but really for all intents and purposes, you should just think of it as in the example above.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K