Energy-Time Uncertainty of Gaussian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on verifying the energy-time uncertainty principle using the wavefunction \(\Psi(x,0) = Ae^{-ax^2}e^{ilx}\). Participants explore the calculations of the expected values \(\langle H \rangle\) and \(\langle H^2 \rangle\), emphasizing the complexity of deriving these values from the time-dependent wavefunction \(\Psi(x,t)\). The discussion also highlights the use of the time evolution operator \(\hat U(t,t_0) = e^{-i(t-t_0) \hat H/\hbar}\) and its application in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of an infinite square well. Participants confirm that the problem primarily serves as a mathematical exercise rather than a means to develop physical intuition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically the energy-time uncertainty principle.
  • Familiarity with wavefunctions and their time evolution in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of operators in quantum mechanics, particularly the Hamiltonian operator \(\hat H\).
  • Ability to perform integrals and derivatives related to quantum states and observables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the energy-time uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of the Hamiltonian operator \(\hat H\) in quantum systems.
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for calculating expected values \(\langle H \rangle\) and \(\langle H^2 \rangle\).
  • Investigate the role of time evolution operators in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to different potential wells.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory and the implications of the energy-time uncertainty principle.

sspitz
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Check the energy-time uncertainty principle for:
\Psi(x,0)=Ae^{-ax^2}e^{ilx}
using the observable x.

Homework Equations


<br /> \Delta{E}\Delta{t}\geq\hbar/2\\<br /> \Delta{E}=\sigma_H=\sqrt{&lt;H^2&gt;-&lt;H&gt;^2}\\<br /> \Delta{t}=\frac{\sigma_x}{\frac{d&lt;x&gt;}{dt}}<br />


The Attempt at a Solution


First I find the wavefunction with time dependence
<br /> \Psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int{\phi(k)e^{ikx-i\frac{\hbar k^{2}t}{2m}}dk}\\<br /> \phi(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int{\Psi(x,0)e^{-ikx}dx}<br />
This gives me a fairly complicated expression
<br /> \Psi(x,t)=\frac{Aexp(\frac{-ax^{2}+lix-\frac{tl^{2}i\hbar}{2m}}{w^{2}})}{w}\\<br /> A^{2}=\sqrt{\frac{2a}{\pi}},w^{2}=1+\frac{\hbar2ita}{m}<br />
Just finding <H> (not to mention <H^2> is giving me a lot of trouble. Is grinding out the derivatives and integrals the only way to do this problem?

The only other options I can think of:

1: <H> and <H^2> should not change in time (?), so I can just use the wavefunction at t=0 to find them? (But, still have to use the wavefunction with time to get the std dev of x)

2: Considering \frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} are like orthonormal eigenfunctions for H, could I say:

<br /> &lt;H&gt;=\int{\phi(k)^{2}E(k)dk}<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
remember that

\Psi (x, t) = e^{(-i/ \hbar) H t} \Psi (x, 0)

H commutes past the time evolution operator

x does not, use a series expansion to determine the correct commutation relation

Furthermore complete the square in the gaussian
 
You are definitely on the right track. Your expression is going to be ugly. Now, set
z\equiv 2 \hbar at/m
and use
\lvert \psi \lvert^2= \sqrt{ \frac{2a}{ \pi}} \frac{1}{ \sqrt{1+ z^2}} e^{-l^2/2a}e^{a\big\{ \frac{(ix+l/2a)^2}{(l+iz)}+ \frac{(-ix +l/2a)^2}{(1-iz)}\big\}}
Expand the term in the brackets {} of the right-hand exponent, and plug it back into
\lvert \psi(x,t) \lvert^2
where your psi should be
\psi(x,t)= \bigg( \frac{2a}{ \pi}\bigg)^{1/4} \frac{1}{ \sqrt{1+2i \hbar at/m}} e^{-l^2/4a}e^{a(ix+l/2a)^2/(1+2ia \hbar t/m)}
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help. I think I got it.

As a check on comprehension, I'd be interested in knowing if #2 in the original post is right or wrong and why. It seems to me that phi(k) above is for energy eigenfunctions what the momentum space wavefunction is for momentum eigenfunctions. That is, roughly, both show the amount of each eigenfunction in psi.
 
Code:
Sorry, I misunderstood your last question, so I'm editing my post. I'm going to have to come back to your #2 point later, since it's getting late where I am. The following was written when I misunderstood your question, so I'm just going to post it rather than waste it. If we're being honest, this problem is designed just to make you do some math. It doesn't really help you with any physical intuition. By convention, the time evolution operator is
\hat U (t,t_0) = e^{-i(t-t_0) \, \hat H/ \hbar}
or in application,
\big\lvert \, \psi(t) \big&gt;= e^{-i(t-t_0) \, \hat H/ \hbar} \big\lvert \, \psi(t_0) \big&gt;
So, for example, if you've got an infinite square well, at t_0 =0, in its ground state,
\big\lvert \, \psi_{n=1} (t=0) \big&gt;= \big\lvert \, \psi_1 (0) \big&gt;= \sqrt{ \frac{2}{a}} \sin\frac{ \pi x}{a}
You know the energy is
E_1= \frac{ \hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}
So at a future time t,
\big\lvert \, \psi_1 (t) \big&gt;= e^{-it \, \hat H/ \hbar} \bigg(\sqrt{ \frac{2}{a}} \sin\frac{ \pi x}{a}\bigg) = \bigg(\sqrt{ \frac{2}{a}} \sin\frac{ \pi x}{a}\bigg)e^{-it \, E_1/ \hbar} =\sqrt{ \frac{2}{a}} \sin\frac{ \pi x}{a}e^{-it \, \hbar \pi^2/2m a^2}
Time evolution is really pretty simple. It gets convoluted with Green's functions and stuff like that, but really for all intents and purposes, you should just think of it as in the example above.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
748
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K