Enhanching directivity of a microstrip patch antenna

  • Thread starter Thread starter tensorbundle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on enhancing the directivity of a microstrip patch antenna, with a specific inquiry about the relationship between effective area and directivity. It is noted that while the effective area for a patch antenna is typically considered to be the metallic area, changing the area alone does not effectively increase directivity. Participants suggest that using an array of properly phased patches could improve directivity, but this may lead to larger antenna sizes, which is a concern for the original poster. The need for alternative methods to enhance directivity without increasing the size of the patch antenna is emphasized. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of antenna design and the trade-offs involved in achieving higher directivity.
tensorbundle
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Antenna theory is quite new to me and I found in constantine Balanis's book that there's a relationship between maximum directivity and effective area of an antenna-if we increase effective area, directivity will also increase. The picture of antenna author used to derive the equation was a horn antenna. Is the equation valid for patch antenna?
I want to know another thing-- as patch antenna radiates signal from edges not through the surface, then which area I would consider as effective area for patch antenna?- is it the edge area or surface area of metallic plate?
My aim is to enhance directivity of a patch antenna. so, please provide me some ideas to achieve high directivity.
Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The metallic area is approximately the value to use. Since the dimensions must be matched to the wavelength of the radiation, you aren't able to arbitrarily change the area. To change directivity, you need to do something else--an array of properly phased patches, for instance.
 
a lot of thanks for the reply.
you aren't able to arbitrarily change the area. To change directivity
That's a very good point .
you need to do something else--an array of properly phased patches
Actually I'm designing a patch antenna for my project. An array of patches would make my antenna size many times larger. I don't want to sacrifice miniaturization for the sake of directivity. Perhaps you are an expert in RF field. can you tell me any other possible way to increase directivity without making the patch antenna bigger?
Thanks again for your cooperation
 
Sorry, I don't know. Maybe someone who knows patch antennas can answer this question.
 
Last edited:
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K