Enough with Fabric of the Cosmos et. al. already

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick_starstrider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmos Fabric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critiques the prevalence of popular science books focused on string theory, such as "The Road to Reality" and "Fabric of the Cosmos." Participants express a desire for literature that explores emergent phenomena in physics, particularly in fields like plasma physics and condensed matter. The conversation highlights the need for authors with expertise in these areas to engage the public with more accessible and exciting content. Overall, there is a consensus that the current focus on unified field theories overshadows other significant and applicable branches of physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of popular science literature and its impact on public engagement.
  • Familiarity with concepts in theoretical physics, particularly string theory.
  • Knowledge of emergent phenomena in physics, including many-body systems.
  • Awareness of different physics fields such as plasma physics and condensed matter physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of emergent phenomena in physics.
  • Explore the latest developments in plasma physics and its applications.
  • Investigate condensed matter physics and its relevance to everyday life.
  • Read critiques of popular science literature to understand its influence on public perception of physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, science communicators, and authors interested in expanding the scope of popular science literature beyond traditional topics like string theory.

maverick_starstrider
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
7
Anyone else getting tired of hearing about books like Road to Reality and Fabric of the Cosmos and everyone and their sister in high school wanting to do string theory?

I really wish someone would write one of these books on like emergent phenomena in physics (like many-body stuff). That way people would get excited in a far bigger (and, IMHO more exciting) field of physics which is on a far more sound ground.

Just my two cents.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm getting tired.

---
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think popular science is a good thing, since it at least somewhat engages with the public and tries to break down the barrier between what scientists do and the layperson's every day life. That said, if you'd like to write a "more exciting" book, then go ahead!
 
"The Road to Reality" is far removed from being one of the normal Pop Sci mag rack books that are a dime a dozen and try to hide as much real math and physics from the reader as possible. There need to be more books like this and less of the others.
 
But they're all unified field theory stuff (and always pluggings the others GUT of choice). Why never plasma physics, condensed matter, etc. And I don't buy that GUT if "big questions" physics. More like unverifiable unapplyable physics
 
maverick_starstrider said:
But they're all unified field theory stuff (and always pluggings the others GUT of choice). Why never plasma physics, condensed matter, etc. And I don't buy that GUT if "big questions" physics. More like unverifiable unapplyable physics

Seems to me like those books need to be written by those doing research in those fields.
Maybe you need to ask the "Roger Penrose"s or "Brian Greene"s of Plasma Physics, or of Condensed Matter, ...or maybe a pop-science writer...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K