Equation for Relativistic Exhaust Velocity (Ve): Help Needed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving an equation for the relativistic exhaust velocity (Ve) given energy applied to a mass over a distance. Participants emphasize that the final velocity depends solely on the total energy applied, not the distance. The key formula involves the relativistic gamma (γ) factor, which can be expressed as γ = 1 + (mass-equivalent-of-energy-added / rest mass). The rest energy of one gram is approximately 9e13 joules, which is crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics concepts, particularly the gamma factor (γ).
  • Familiarity with energy-mass equivalence (E=mc²).
  • Basic knowledge of joules and gigajoules as units of energy.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving mass and energy conversions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the relativistic gamma factor (γ) in detail.
  • Learn about energy-mass equivalence and its applications in relativistic physics.
  • Explore numerical methods for calculating relativistic velocities based on energy input.
  • Investigate the implications of distance in acceleration versus final velocity in relativistic contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, and students studying relativistic mechanics who are interested in the relationship between energy, mass, and velocity in high-speed scenarios.

BitWiz
Gold Member
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have an equation that -- given energy applied to a mass over a distance -- will give me an (ideal) final velocity of the mass?

If I direct a gigajoule to accelerate a gram over a distance of a meter, I obviously get into real trouble with c using conventional equations.

I've found equations that apply Lorentz -- but they seem to do it as an adjustment after a raw, conventional velocity has been obtained, using this final, conventional velocity to plug into Lorentz. That can't work in this case. I'm looking for a function Ve( joules, mass, distance ) that works for all non-negative parameter values, and takes relativity into account. Can you help?

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BitWiz said:
Does anyone have an equation that -- given energy applied to a mass over a distance -- will give me an (ideal) final velocity of the mass?

Take the ratio of total energy to rest energy: that gives you the relativistic ##\gamma## factor. Then invert the formula for ##\gamma## in terms of ##v## to get ##v##.
 
BitWiz said:
If I direct a gigajoule to accelerate a gram over a distance of a meter, I obviously get into real trouble with c using conventional equations.

You should check your math first. Hint: what is the rest energy of one gram of mass, in gigajoules?
 
BitWiz said:
given energy applied to a mass over a distance

The distance is actually irrelevant to the final velocity. It is only relevant to determining the acceleration required to achieve that velocity. The final velocity only depends on the total energy applied.
 
PeterDonis said:
You should check your math first. Hint: what is the rest energy of one gram of mass, in gigajoules?
c2 / 1000 ?
 
BitWiz said:
c2 / 1000 ?

If you calculate this numerically and convert to gigajoules, yes. What do you get?
 
PeterDonis said:
The distance is actually irrelevant to the final velocity. It is only relevant to determining the acceleration required to achieve that velocity. The final velocity only depends on the total energy applied.
So, v = v' * rest_mass / (Rest_mass + Jo
PeterDonis said:
If you calculate this numerically and convert to gigajoules, yes. What do you get?
~898756 Gj ?
 
BitWiz said:
v = v' * rest_mass / (Rest_mass + Jo

No. Try starting from what I said in post #2.

BitWiz said:
~898756 Gj ?

I think you're too high by an order of magnitude.
 
Whoops.
If a joule = 1 (kg) / c2, then 1kg = c2j, and a gram is 1000th of that?

If c is ~ 3e8, then c2 is 9e16j for a kg. For a gram, 9e13j. For a gigajoule, 9e4?
 
  • #10
PeterDonis said:
No. Try starting from what I said in post #2.

You're saying that gamma is 1 + ( mass-equivalent-of-energy-added / rest mass ) ?

Thanks!
 
  • #11
BitWiz said:
You're saying that gamma is 1 + ( mass-equivalent-of-energy-added / rest mass ) ?

That's one way of putting it, yes. Or you could just do everything in energy units; it works out the same either way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K