Equation of a Line in three space question

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomasrules
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the equation of a line in three-dimensional space that passes through the point (4,5,5) and intersects the line defined by the parametric equations (x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 at right angles. Participants clarify the importance of using the direction vector (3,-1,1) from the given line's equation and emphasize the necessity of the dot product to establish perpendicularity. The correct approach involves determining the point of intersection and utilizing the projection formula to derive the line's equation accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of three-dimensional geometry
  • Familiarity with vector notation and operations
  • Knowledge of parametric equations of lines
  • Proficiency in using the dot product for vector analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of vector projections in three-dimensional space
  • Learn how to derive equations of lines from parametric forms
  • Explore the application of dot products in determining vector perpendicularity
  • Practice solving problems involving intersections of lines in 3D geometry
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with three-dimensional vector analysis and line equations.

thomasrules
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
This question is really pissing me off because I don't understand it. I know how to do it but don't understand the reasoning:

Find an equation of the line through the point (4,5,5) that meets the line

(x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 at right angles.

I found out that you have to do the dot product of (4,5,5) and that equation but I don't understand why you don't need the direction vector for the other equation to find the answer. Also why couldn't you just do (4,5,5) dot (11,-8,4)?:mad:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't dot product a vector and an equation.

How're you reading off the direction vector of the line from its equation?
 
direction vector=(3,-1,1)
 
Still not entirely sure I see what the difficulty is: you know that the point where the line from (4,5,5) hits the given line perpendicularly is also the closest point to (4,5,5) on the line.
 
thomasrules said:
I found out that you have to do the dot product of (4,5,5) and that equation
No, you didn't find that out- it doesn't make sense. (4,5,5) is a point not a vector and you can't take a dot product of anything with an equation! That's one reason why its not a good idea to write a vector in the form (a,b,c). I prefer either ai+ bj+ ck or <a, b, c>.

Let (x,y,z) be the point on the given line where that perpendicular crosses. Then (x-4)i+ (y-5)j+ (z-5)k is a vector in the direction of that line. Yes, 3i- j+ 3k is a vector in the direction of the given line. Since they are perpendicular, their dot product: 3(x-4)- (y-5)+ 3(z-5)= 0.
Multiplying that out, 3x- y+ 3z= 12- 5+ 15= 22 (that may be where you got the idea that you were doing "the dot product of (4,5,5) and that equation"). That equation, together with the equations (x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 is enough to solve for x, y, and z and then the equation of the line.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Then (x-4)i+ (y-5)j+ (z-5)k is a vector in the direction of that line. Yes, 3i- j+ 3k is a vector in the direction of the given line. Since they are perpendicular, their dot product: 3(x-4)- (y-5)+ 3(z-5)= 0.
Multiplying that out, 3x- y+ 3z= 12- 5+ 15= 22. That equation, together with the equations (x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 is enough to solve for x, y, and z and then the equation of the line.


Ok let me show you how i think it's to be done because I don't get your part of

"That equation, together with the equations (x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 is enough to solve for x, y, and z and then the equation of the line."

r=(11,-8,4)+t(3,-1,1)

r1=(4,5,5)+t(x,y,z)

r dot r1= (11+3t,-8-t,4+1)dot(4+x,5+y,5+z)=0


IS THAT RIGHT?

And how did you get "Yes, 3i- j+ 3k" isn't it 3i-j+k?
 
yes the vector is 3,-1,1, best is to draw a diagram with the point/Line and new point and use the projection formula to understand the above.
 
Last edited:
anyone help
 
And how did you get "Yes, 3i- j+ 3k" isn't it 3i-j+k?
That was a "miscopy".
Rewrite:
Let (x,y,z) be the point on the given line where that perpendicular crosses. Then (x-4)i+ (y-5)j+ (z-5)k is a vector in the direction of that line. Yes, 3i- j+ k is a vector in the direction of the given line. Since they are perpendicular, their dot product: 3(x-4)- (y-5)+ (z-5)= 0.
Multiplying that out, 3x- y+ z= 12- 5+ 5= 12

Now you also know (x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 since (x, y, z) lies on that line.
From 3x- y+ z= 12, we can write z= -3x+ y+ 12 and then we have, from the equations for the line, (x-11)/3= (-3x+y+ 8) and (y+8)/-1= (-3x+y+8), two equations to solve for x and y.
 
  • #10
Plenty of help has been given, but it still isn't clear what *you* are doing i.e. your explanations of what you are doing do not make sense, we think of your claim that you know to take the dot product of sometihng with an equation.

The simplest thing to do is to draw a picture to see how to use the projection formula to get a vector parallel to the required line, and then you know a vector parallel to the desired line and a point on the line hence you konw the equation of the line.

So, draw a diagram: a long line represents the given one; mark a point not on the line to represent (4,5,5); draw a line from the point to the given line, and draw one the meets perpendicularly; think about projections using dot products etc, it is quite clear, and you shuold also attempt to bear in mind the limitations of the web as a place for explaining diagrams: it is up to you to draw one not us.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K