Equation with two inequalities

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter find_the_fun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the compound inequality \(2h+1 \leq n \leq 2^{h+1}\) for the variable \(h\). Participants clarify that this can be approached by splitting the chain of inequalities into two separate inequalities: \(2h+1 \leq n\) and \(n \leq 2^{h+1}\). The solutions for \(h\) are derived as \(h \leq \frac{n-1}{2}\) and \(h \geq \log_2(n) - 1\), leading to the conclusion that the valid values for \(h\) lie within the intersection of these two constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inequalities and their manipulation
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions, specifically base-2 logarithms
  • Familiarity with algebraic expressions and solving for variables
  • Basic comprehension of real numbers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inequalities and how to manipulate them effectively
  • Learn about logarithmic functions, particularly the implications of base-2 logarithms
  • Explore advanced algebraic techniques for solving compound inequalities
  • Investigate real number properties and their applications in inequalities
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on algebra and inequalities. It is also useful for anyone looking to enhance their problem-solving skills in mathematical expressions involving multiple constraints.

find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
This is part of a larger problem and I'm trying to solve 2h+1≤n≤2h+1 for h. If the equation had two equals signs or one inequality I think I could do it but I'm not sure how to proceed with both. In other words, I don't know how to manipulate an expression of the form (expr1)≤(expr2)≤(expr3). Any help would be appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
find_the_fun said:
This is part of a larger problem and I'm trying to solve 2h+1≤n≤2h+1 for h. If the equation had two equals signs or one inequality I think I could do it but I'm not sure how to proceed with both. In other words, I don't know how to manipulate an expression of the form (expr1)≤(expr2)≤(expr3). Any help would be appreciated.

You can split a "chain of inequalities" into single inequalities connected by an $\wedge $-sign:

$ 2h+1≤n≤2^{h+1}~\implies~ 2h+1 \leq n ~\wedge ~ n\leq 2^{h+1} $

The final set of solutions is the interception of the two single sets of solutions (sorry if my English sounds a little bit cryptic)
 
find_the_fun said:
This is part of a larger problem and I'm trying to solve 2h+1≤n≤2h+1 for h. If the equation had two equals signs or one inequality I think I could do it but I'm not sure how to proceed with both. In other words, I don't know how to manipulate an expression of the form (expr1)≤(expr2)≤(expr3). Any help would be appreciated.

Assuming both \(h\) and \(n\) are real:

Do each seperatly so \(2h+1\le n \Rightarrow h\le \frac{n-1}{2} \), and \(n\le2^{h+1}\Rightarrow h \ge \log_2(n)-1\)

The simultaneous solutions are values in the overlap of the two parts of the real line to which the two conditions constrain \(h\)

CB
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K