Equations for Entanglement and the Double Slit Experiment: A Layman's Guide

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the request for two specific equations related to quantum physics: one describing particle entanglement and the other explaining the double slit experiment's outcome when observed. The scope includes both theoretical and conceptual aspects of quantum mechanics, with a focus on how these equations can be visually represented for a tattoo design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests two equations for a tattoo, specifically for entanglement and the double slit experiment.
  • Some participants suggest specific equations for entanglement and the double slit experiment, indicating that the first equation describes a pair of spin-entangled particles.
  • Others clarify that the second equation is not about entanglement but relates to the wave-particle duality observed in the double slit experiment.
  • There is a suggestion to keep the wave function expression for aesthetic reasons in the tattoo design.
  • Participants discuss the importance of clarity and beauty in the mathematical representation for the tattoo, with some preferring different notations.
  • One participant raises concerns about the varying forms of the double slit equations presented, seeking agreement on a definitive version.
  • Another participant emphasizes that mathematical expressions can be represented in multiple ways, each with varying degrees of aesthetic appeal.
  • There is a suggestion to use bra-ket notation for consistency between the equations.
  • Participants express appreciation for the collaborative effort in refining the equations for the tattoo design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the best representations of the equations, particularly for the double slit experiment. There is no consensus on a single definitive equation, as multiple valid forms are proposed and discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of aesthetic considerations for the tattoo, suggesting that the equations should be visually appealing while still conveying the intended quantum concepts. The discussion also highlights the subjective nature of mathematical beauty and clarity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring the intersection of art and science, particularly those looking to incorporate quantum physics concepts into visual designs, such as tattoos.

  • #31
Aha I was trying to do that, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
So far I like the look of Kith's version. I see it's gotten a couple of thumbs up. I would really like to see a couple more thumbs up before taking it into Photoshop, and then tattooing it into skin. Hopefully a few more might see this thread and weigh in.

Best all ...
kith said:
But for the tatoo, I think I would drop the ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}## completely. ##|\Psi \rangle = |\uparrow \downarrow \rangle + |\downarrow \uparrow \rangle ## is much more beautiful to me and it isn't wrong. It uses a different convention which makes calculations more inconvenient, but it captures the essence of entanglement just like the other one. Arguably even more because of its simpler form. Also your second equation seems to already use the same convention.
 
  • #33
@renkma, you can send people a notification by writing an "@" in front of their name. So if you want the opinions of other people who have commented earlier in your thread, you can call them like this: @Geofleur @Nugatory @cgk @dipole

Also you should include Demystifier's suggestion (as you already did in your first photoshop version). The excess of space between the horizontal bar and the arrow isn't intentional, it is an artifact of using simplistic typesetting.
 
  • #34
I too like kith's suggestion of dropping the 1/2, and Demystifier's version (post #30) of kith's suggestion looks good to me.
 
  • #35
Excellent. I'm going with the double slit experiment equation I originally posted in #21 ,
and the following from post #30 (originally Kith's suggestion) for my entanglement.

Demystifier said:
A minor improvement:
## | \Psi \rangle = |\! \uparrow \downarrow \rangle + |\! \downarrow \uparrow \rangle##
(I reduced the space between "|" and the arrow. In Latex this is done by \! command, which often makes equations look better.)

Thank you everyone for getting involved and helping me out. I so appreciate it. I will post the tattoos when they are completed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
623
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K