Equations for the Lawson Klein Figure

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lxln
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure Klein
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equations and methods for constructing the Lawson Klein bottle, particularly in the context of using a mathematical graphic application. Participants express interest in both the theoretical aspects and practical implementations of the figure, including its representation in three-dimensional space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks equations for the Lawson Klein bottle, specifically the version composed of two Sudanese Möbius bands, and mentions the limitations of their graphic application in handling higher dimensions.
  • Another participant inquires about a simpler three-dimensional formulation that can be directly used in their application, noting that existing references may involve four-dimensional embeddings.
  • A third participant shares a code snippet used to generate a sculpture of the Lawson Klein bottle, detailing the mathematical transformations involved in the process.
  • One participant expresses admiration for the shared sculpture and seeks further insights beyond the existing work, questioning the necessity of four-dimensional representations and suggesting the possibility of a three-dimensional description.
  • There is a suggestion that understanding the mathematics behind the figure is essential, with a desire for a more accessible three-dimensional equation to facilitate learning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a common interest in the Lawson Klein bottle and its representations, but there is no consensus on the existence or form of a simple three-dimensional equation. The discussion reflects multiple viewpoints on the dimensionality and complexity of the figure.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the challenges of working with higher-dimensional mathematics and the need for clarity in translating these concepts into three-dimensional models. There are references to specific mathematical transformations and programming techniques, but no resolution on the best approach is reached.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in mathematical modeling, graphic applications in mathematics, and the study of complex geometric figures may find this discussion relevant.

lxln
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Does anybody know the equations for the Lawson Klein bottle ? I am trying to construct it in a maths graphic application.

Just to be precise its the version of the Klein bottle that is composed of two Sudanese Mobius bands, also it may be that the application will only cope with ordinary 3-d space. The simpler the better !

The two best references I have found are here:
http://plus.maths.org/content/os/issue26/features/mathart/index
-towards the bottom of the page also has a link to a great 3D model.

and here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Möbius_strip
-not so pretty but has parametric equations, unfortunately while I have some 'in principle' understanding of what is going on the math is a little beyond me and maybe even the graphic application too.


Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lxln said:
Hi,

Does anybody know the equations for the Lawson Klein bottle ? I am trying to construct it in a maths graphic application.

I should add that the programme i am trying to construct it in is spacetime.us: the wikipedia equations appear to refer to a 4 dimensional embedding which can be projected into 3d space. Is there a simple 3D formulation I can simply plug into spacetime.us ?
 
Here's the code I used to generate a recent sculpture. It might not be the world's most efficient, but it got the job done. It actually came from Daniel Piker's explorations, which you can find here: http://vimeo.com/2495945

This is C# written for the SpaceClaim API, but I reckon it's pretty readable:

public static Point Evaluate(PointUV uv, double p, double q, double circleAngle, Vector inverseOffset, bool isInverted) {
double u = uv.U;
double v = uv.V;

Circle circle = Circle.Create(Frame.World, 1);
circle = circle.CreateTransformedCopy(Matrix.CreateRotation(Line.Create(Point.Origin, Direction.DirY), circleAngle));

return LawsonTransform(circle.Evaluate(u).Point, v, p, q, inverseOffset, isInverted);
}

public static Point LawsonTransform(Point point, double t, double p, double q, Vector inverseOffset, bool isInverted) {
double xa = point.X;
double you = point.Y;
double za = point.Z;

//reverse stereographically project to Riemann hypersphere
double xb = 2 * xa / (1 + xa * xa + you * you + za * za);
double yb = 2 * you / (1 + xa * xa + you * you + za * za);
double zb = 2 * za / (1 + xa * xa + you * you + za * za);
double wb = (-1 + xa * xa + you * you + za * za) / (1 + xa * xa + you * you + za * za);

//now rotate the hypersphere
double xc = xb * Math.Cos(p * t) + yb * Math.Sin(p * t);
double yc = -xb * Math.Sin(p * t) + yb * Math.Cos(p * t);
double zc = zb * Math.Cos(q * t) - wb * Math.Sin(q * t);
double wc = zb * Math.Sin(q * t) + wb * Math.Cos(q * t);

//then project stereographically back to flat 3D
double xd = xc / (1 - wc);
double yd = yc / (1 - wc);
double zd = zc / (1 - wc);

point = Point.Create(xd, yd, zd);

//spherical inversion
if (isInverted) {
point += inverseOffset;
point = Point.Origin + point.Vector.Direction * 1 / point.Vector.Magnitude;

if (
Double.IsNaN(point.X) || Double.IsNaN(point.Y) || Double.IsNaN(point.Z) ||
Double.IsInfinity(point.X) || Double.IsInfinity(point.Y) || Double.IsInfinity(point.Z)
)
return Point.Origin;
}

return point;
}

And I call Evaluate() with:

double p = 0.5;
double q = 1;
double circleAngle = Math.PI / 2;
Vector inverseOffset = Vector.Create(0.5, 0, 0);
bool isInverted = true;

If you're curious, here's the sculpture:
http://www.coroflot.com/public/individual_details.asp?individual_id=260043

And here's a video of the tabs growing on it:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for that !

I had a look at your sculpture and models and they are pretty effing cool ! Out of interest how did you make the physical model ?

My question is a bit disingenuous - I find the figure fascinating and am studying my way to understanding it -I think there is in the end nothing for it but to build up the maths to understand at least the Wikipedia entry. Nevertheless I was wondering if there was any interesting scientific or mathematical insight that could be picked up on this forum over and above Daniel Pikers work - no such luck so far...

I am not familiar with script (yet!) but from reading through yours there are some mathematical components that are familiar. It seems conventional to create the figure in 4 dimensions and project back into 3 - but if it can be manifested in 3 should there not be a 3D description/equation (albeit intersecting) ? Would tide me over until I work out how to create and use 4D data sets and project them back into 3D !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
41K