Equicontinuity at a point if.f. continuous function constant

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
adam512
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a problem I cannot solve. I have been working with problems with convergence of sequences of functions for some time now. But I can't seem to solve most of the problems. Anyway here is my problem:

Consider a continuous function [itex]f: [0, \infty) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex]. For each [itex]n[/itex] define [itex]f_n(x) = f(x^n)[/itex]. Show that the set of continuous function [itex]\{f_1, f_2, \ldots \}[/itex] is equicontinuous at [itex]x=1[/itex] if and only if [itex]f[/itex] is a constant function.

1. Assume [itex]f = k[/itex] is constant, then [itex]f_n(x) = f(x^n) = k[/itex] for all [itex]x[/itex].

[itex]|f_n(x) - f_n(y) | = |f(x^n) - f(y^n)| = |k-k| = 0[/itex], so it is indeed equicontinuous everywhere, in particular at 1.


2. Assume [itex]f_n[/itex] is equicontinuous at [itex]x=1[/itex]. By definition this means

[itex]\forall \epsilon > 0, \, \exists \delta > 0[/itex] : [itex]|1 - y| < \delta \Rightarrow |f_n(1) - f_n(y)| < \epsilon[/itex] holds for all [itex]n[/itex].

Now [itex]f_n(1) = f(1^n) = f(1)[/itex] for all [itex]n[/itex], let's say [itex]f(1^n) = c[/itex], and [itex]f_n(y) = f(y^n)[/itex]. So we can write the above expression:

[itex]\forall \epsilon > 0, \, \exists \delta > 0[/itex] : [itex]|1 - y| < \delta \Rightarrow |f(y^n) - c| < \epsilon[/itex].

Now from this I want to arrive at [itex]f[/itex] is constant. I think I need to use the fact that [itex]f[/itex] is continuous but I can't see how. It feels intuitively right that if [itex]|f(y^n) - c| < \epsilon[/itex] for every [itex]n[/itex], it is arbitrarily close to a constant function along a sequence which for [itex]y < 1[/itex] converges to 0, and for [itex]y > 1[/itex] diverges to [itex]\infty[/itex].

Thanks in advance!
 
on Phys.org
Let's give an intuitive argument. I leave it up to you to get this thing rigorous.

Take ##\varepsilon## small. Find a ##\delta## such that equicontinuity holds at ##1##. We know that if ##|y-1|<\delta##, then ##|f(y^n) - c|<\varepsilon##. And you know this to be true for all ##n##. Assume that ##y = 1/2## is of ##\delta##-distance of ##1##. Then you know that all of

[tex]f(1/2), f(1/4),..., f(1/2^n)[/tex]

are ##\varepsilon##-close to ##c##.

Let's take a smaller ##\varepsilon^\prime## now and take a ##\delta^\prime## satisfying equicontinuity. We might not have anymore that ##1/2## is within ##\delta^\prime##-distance of ##1##. But maybe ##\sqrt{1/2}## or something similar is, and then you know that all of

[tex]f(\sqrt{1/2}), f(1/2), ...[/tex]

is within ##\varepsilon^\prime##-distance of ##c##, and this contains the previous sequence.

You see where I'm going??
 
Thanks for the reply!

But I am afraid I still don't see how this can be used to show that [itex]f[/itex] is constant.

I think you are going for the fact that [itex]f[/itex] must be constant since it is arbitrarily close to a constant function along every sequence?
There must be something I'm missing. It's the same with every single problem. I get halfway but then never manage to finish.

I have a question about this: In my textbook it says that

[itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow p} f(x) = q[/itex] if and only if [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} f(p_n) = q[/itex] whenever [itex]p_n \neq p[/itex] and [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} p_n = p[/itex].

I must ask this. If we for example have that

for every [itex]p_n \rightarrow p[/itex] have [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} f(p_n) = constant[/itex] implies that [itex]f[/itex] is constant?
 
R136a1 said:
Let's give an intuitive argument. I leave it up to you to get this thing rigorous.

Take ##\varepsilon## small. Find a ##\delta## such that equicontinuity holds at ##1##. We know that if ##|y-1|<\delta##, then ##|f(y^n) - c|<\varepsilon##. And you know this to be true for all ##n##. Assume that ##y = 1/2## is of ##\delta##-distance of ##1##. Then you know that all of

[tex]f(1/2), f(1/4),..., f(1/2^n)[/tex]

are ##\varepsilon##-close to ##c##.

Let's take a smaller ##\varepsilon^\prime## now and take a ##\delta^\prime## satisfying equicontinuity. We might not have anymore that ##1/2## is within ##\delta^\prime##-distance of ##1##. But maybe ##\sqrt{1/2}## or something similar is, and then you know that all of

[tex]f(\sqrt{1/2}), f(1/2), ...[/tex]

is within ##\varepsilon^\prime##-distance of ##c##, and this contains the previous sequence.

You see where I'm going??

adam512 said:
Thanks for the reply!

But I am afraid I still don't see how this can be used to show that [itex]f[/itex] is constant.

It is easier to prove the contrapositive: show that if [itex]f[/itex] is not constant then [itex](f_n)[/itex] are not equicontinuous at 1.

You will want to recall that if [itex]x > 0[/itex] then
[tex] \lim_{k \to \infty} x^{1/k} = 1.[/tex]