Equilibrium bond lengths for excited molecules

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equilibrium bond lengths of excited molecules can be calculated ab initio by optimizing the excited state geometry through iterative methods. This involves calculating the wave function and the gradient of the excited state total energy with respect to nuclear positions, similar to ground state optimizations. Key electronic structure methods for this process include Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (TD-DFT), Coupled Cluster method CC2, and Multi-Configuration Self-Consistent Field (MCSCF). The main distinction lies in the requirement to use methods capable of accurately describing excited states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Morse Potential graphs
  • Familiarity with ab initio methods in quantum chemistry
  • Knowledge of electronic structure methods such as TD-DFT and CC2
  • Basic concepts of wave functions and energy gradients
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (TD-DFT) for excited state calculations
  • Explore the Coupled Cluster method CC2 and its advantages over MP2 for excited states
  • Study Multi-Configuration Self-Consistent Field (MCSCF) methods for complex molecular systems
  • Investigate the use of spectroscopic data to determine excited state bond lengths
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, quantum physicists, and researchers involved in molecular modeling and spectroscopy, particularly those focusing on excited state properties of diatomic molecules.

Woodles
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
When making the Morse Potential graphs of diatomic molecules going through a transition, the excited state sometimes has a different equilibrium bond length. A visual example is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Franck-Condon-diagram.png

I was wondering how the average bond length of the excited state can be calculated ab-initio, or how it can be determined from spectroscopic data.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the ab initio world, bond lengths of excited states are basically determined exactly as bond lengths of ground states: You take some initial geometry, calculate a wave function, and based on that the gradient of the excited state total energy with respect to the nuclear positions. You then update the positions to reduce this gradient. This process is iterated until the gradient becomes sufficiently close to zero; you then have your equilibirum geometry from which the bond lengths can be directly read off. The only difference to a ground state geometry optimization is that the energy and gradient of an excited state need to be taken, not of the ground state. This often requires using some different electronic structure methods, because not all methods can describe excited states (e.g., TD-DFT instead of Kohn-Sham DFT, CC2 instead of MP2, MCSCF instead of HF, etc). But conceptually there is no difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K