Equilibrium Style Question involving a Weight

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a traction apparatus used to support a fractured tibia, requiring the calculation of the mass of a weight and the traction force applied along the leg. The context is rooted in mechanics, specifically relating to forces and equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish equations based on the forces acting on the leg and the weight, but expresses uncertainty about their correctness. Some participants question the clarity of the provided attachment and its relevance to the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with one suggesting that the differing angles could lead to a net upward force that balances the weight of the leg. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the discussion is exploring various interpretations of the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of clarity in their initial approach and the potential for incorrect assumptions regarding the weight calculation. The attachment's visibility issues may also impact the discussion.

Emethyst
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


While a fractured tibia is healing, it must be kept horizontal and under some tension. One method of doing this is to support the leg by using a variation of the Russel traction apparatus. The lower leg (including the foot) of a patient weighs 51.5N, which must be supported in the traction apparatus. a) What is the mass of the weight shown? b) What traction force does the apparatus apply along the direction of the leg?


Homework Equations


Newton's second law, pythagorean's theorem, right triangle properties



The Attempt at a Solution


No idea where to start with this. The picture of the situation is provided (if it shows up, hopefully). My idea was to find two equations for the traction force and then sub one into the other to solve for the weight. My first equation was tan46=FN/Fapp, where FN=FG leg + Weight and tan37=weight/Fapp. I think this is wrong though because I get an answer that seems too large for the weight, so I have no idea how to properly go about this question. If anyone can be of assistance it would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • UNTITLED1.PNG
    UNTITLED1.PNG
    2 KB · Views: 595
Physics news on Phys.org
Weird. I approved the attachment, and can see a small thumbnail of it, but when I click on it, I only get a black image with a few words on it. Can anybody else expand the thumbnail?

Emethyst, can you maybe repost the attachment as a PDF? PrimoPDF is a free writer if you don't have one already.
 
Ok does this work for the attachment?
 

Attachments

I can see it now. I'm not sure, but I think the fact that the two angles are different will give you a net upward force at the leg, which must equal the weight of the leg and foot. That should let you work back to the mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K