Equipartition theorem and molecule of CO

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecule Theorem
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
If I understand the equipartition theorem more or less well, if I heat up a gas then the energy I have spent to heat it up should be equally distributed to the rotational part and vibrational part of the molecule dynamics.
Let's take the molecule of CO, I think it has 5 degrees of freedom. 3 vibrationals, 2 rotationals. I don't understand how does the equipartition theorem applies there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vibrationrotationenergy.svg, taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotational_spectroscopy#Structure_of_rotational_spectra. It seems that whenever I excitate the molecule, it will gain at least energy in the vibrational form. And if I'm lucky, in the rotational form too. But it seems forbidden to gain energy only in the rotational form. How does this agree with the equipartition theorem?! :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equipartition theorem applies only in the classical limit. I.e., when (on average) the molecules are excited to high quantum numbers.
 
EmpaDoc said:
The equipartition theorem applies only in the classical limit. I.e., when (on average) the molecules are excited to high quantum numbers.

Thanks a lot. For some reason I thought it applied for low temperatures/ground states.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top