Error by a factor of 10 in peroxide/permanganate titration

In summary, the person is trying to titrate an acid with a base and is having trouble figuring out where their error is. They suspect that their error may be somewhere in the equation for the balanced redox reaction. They used a year ago and claimed to have used an average of 21ml of KMnO4, but this year their endpoint is being reached after about 2.0-2.3ml off by a factor of 10 from the theoretical endpoint. They think that it may be something very simple and may try purchasing a bottle of 3% commercial peroxide to try and find the error.
  • #1
mrbelliveau
2
0
Hi all,

Trying to get this titration working correctly and for the life of me, I can't figure out where my error is. This is what I have:

Burette contains 0.01M KMnO4 (I'm positive that my error does not come from preparing this - 0.4g in 250ml of water, with a molar mass of 158g/mol. Additionally, when I standardize it with Mohr's salt, everything works out fine)

The anylate is prepared by doing the following (I suspect the error must be somewhere in here):
- add 1 ml of industrial (30% or 9.8M) H2O2 to 99ml of water, making 0.3% (or 0.098M, essentially 0.1M) H2O2
- then add 5ml of this dilute H2O2 to the Erlenmeyer flask to be titrated, along with ~20ml of 3M sulfuric acid (more than enough to provide the acidic medium).

In the balanced redox reaction, it shows 5 peroxides reacting per 2 moles of permanganate ...so using a bit of math, it should take about 20 ml's of 0.01M permanganate ion to reach the endpoint. I use this equation to account for the balanced stoichiometric coefficients:

(volume of H2O2) * (concentration of H2O2) * (2) = (volume of permanganate) * (concentration of permanganate) * (5)

I created this experiment a year ago and in my chicken-scratchy notes, I claimed to have used an average of ~21ml of KMnO4, but this year I feel like I'm following the same steps, and my endpoint is being reached after about 2.0 - 2.3ml, off by a factor of about 10 from the theoretical endpoint (and from previous years). Not sure where else I am going wrong. I'm sure it's something very simple! Anyone out there familiar with this titration (or titrations in general) who may be able to shed some light on the location of my error?

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide!

Postscript: I know there is a phenomenon that exists where a pseudo end-point is reached in this type of redox titration early on in the titration, but I've added a substantial amount of MnO4 after the end-point I'm reaching and it has shown no sign of fading.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
Expected 20 mL looks more or less correct (I got 19.6, so exactly the same order of magnitude).

Perhaps you used 3% peroxide this year? Or the old one decomposed, it is not that stable after all.
 
  • #3
Thanks for the suggestion. The bottle was purchased and opened for the first time a little over a year ago and has been in a sealed, clear, plastic bottle in a dark cabinet in a warm climate. I also thought about it decomposing a bit, but find it hard to believe that it dropped from 30% all the way to 3%. Other people had access to it besides myself, so I guess I can't positively attest to its purity.

I might just try purchasing a bottle of 3% commercial peroxide and trying the same thing (but with a 1:10 dilution).

Thanks again!
 

1. What is the cause of an error by a factor of 10 in peroxide/permanganate titration?

The most common cause of such a large error in this type of titration is a miscalculation or mistake in the amount of titrant used or in the volume measurements.

2. How can I prevent this type of error in my titration experiments?

To avoid such errors, it is important to carefully measure and record the volume of titrant used and to double-check all calculations. Additionally, using precise and calibrated equipment can help reduce the likelihood of errors.

3. Are there any other factors that can contribute to a large error in peroxide/permanganate titrations?

Yes, other factors such as contamination of the solutions, improper mixing, or incorrect titration techniques can also lead to significant errors in the results.

4. Can the error by a factor of 10 be corrected or compensated for?

In most cases, it is difficult to correct or compensate for such a large error. It is best to repeat the experiment and take extra precautions to minimize sources of error.

5. Are there any alternative methods to peroxide/permanganate titrations that may be more accurate?

There are other methods for measuring peroxide or permanganate concentrations, such as spectrophotometry or redox titrations, which may be more accurate and reliable. It is important to consider the specific needs and limitations of your experiment when choosing a method for analysis.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • Chemistry
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
21K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
15K
Back
Top