Error estimation of moment of inertia of a flywheel

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the moment of inertia (I) of a flywheel using the formula I = mr^2 [n2/(n1+n2)] [(gt^2)/(2h) - 1]. Key variables include mass (m), radius (r), number of revolutions (n1 and n2), time (t), and height (h). Participants debate the appropriate method for calculating percentage errors for n1 and n2, with a specific focus on the approximation that allows ignoring the -1 in the formula. The consensus indicates that while n2 appears twice in the formula, its error should not be doubled due to cancellation effects in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and moment of inertia
  • Familiarity with error analysis in experimental physics
  • Knowledge of basic kinematics and gravitational acceleration
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic formulas for physical calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study error propagation techniques in physics experiments
  • Learn about the significance of approximations in physical formulas
  • Explore the concept of moment of inertia in different geometries
  • Investigate the effects of varying mass and radius on rotational inertia
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, engineers working with rotational systems, and anyone involved in experimental mechanics or error analysis will benefit from this discussion.

angelina
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
now i get the formula I = mr^2 [n2/(n1+n2)] [(gt^2)/(2h) - 1]
where m = mass of the hanging wieght; r = radius; n1 = no. of revolutions before the weight reaches the floor; n2 = no. of revolutions before the flywheel stops; t = time taken for the weight to reach the floor; h = height of which the weight had dropped.

and I'm to calculate the % error of I.

- what is the error of n1 and n2? 1 revolution??
- in my practical book, before asking me to calculate the respective % error of all the variables, it states "since gt^2/2h >> 1, by approximation, % error of ... = ... ", what the actual meaning of this statement??
- the formula of % error of I stated is the book is 2x<r> + <n1> + <n2> + 2x<t> + <h>, where <*> = % error of *. but i think % error of n2 should be multiplied by a 2, is this a mistake of me or the book??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
angelina said:
it states "since gt^2/2h >> 1,
That means you can ignore the -1 in (gt^2)/(2h) - 1
angelina said:
i think % error of n2 should be multiplied by a 2
Although it occurs twice, it does not occur as n22. E.g. consider n2/n2; the errors would cancel.
However, the sum in the denominator makes it rather tricky. There is no simple formula. If n2>>n1 then it would be <n1>+<n2>; if n2<<n1 then it would be 0. So <n1>+<n2> is worst case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K